From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...] Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:12:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87tuqbft57.fsf@telefonica.net> <87im6rndo0.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9aqn5eq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7ma7k5y.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuqa1ogn.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuqa5ug7.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehdy5ie.fsf@gnus.org> <87czwwuukq.fsf@gnus.org> <267bf03a-8c14-76ab-ba87-36c495d23e05@yandex.ru> <87k0r4tduc.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38550"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 14:14:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD5bi-0009uS-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:14:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD5bh-0003tv-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD5aM-0002pA-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:12:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:34810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD5aL-0005s5-1A; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:12:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id o10so4371307wmc.1; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:12:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xqKxfr4aWfad4Q7kGXdUL61mbDk6h7BeCLPDjni2qZg=; b=LQKb1tEQ1PU5O+wmiKegEQoVAf5N/1mGQIKb676YGj07/bnZnV4ZDSVEmjoNHJbT+k RLw3kX6APk9sjzv/APuiG15Qn6Ni6NAVR6pv9vAUs02Ds8xBNTLo+mBOP++/ALXRGgq+ Ws/5nQIL37HBCJ07HIJvnDRXc/EF1bY6Eh376Yr4VUah9xoAsDd3k0FeSEPSLjy+6hUC Iff4DMB2Nd/fGDSgLD6F+achHJnYdugOsM0Y8BKCbvH4eGhbgAplloUc9TfMzIGhYAQz ++4M7YPdWjOCGahtRNsUuXtDBn+p4BCHbvtko15O9lDmYkC6kGCHn+BWJTFKKOFEZwaI 0qEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xqKxfr4aWfad4Q7kGXdUL61mbDk6h7BeCLPDjni2qZg=; b=HU1qNXkvmLYccpIMbBjUtmmyMR50MHSYiGrkVXFDRc09qaOBwE9JEoEUfqm+kMODpG SDPfNez3tQaSrFC6I9B3raQIABbwH+8bIpDRCCcvjh2cOd7oqPyrlb3rvc4uvbPv95am S/byUYnva3yS+z01iuW0bLzeEEssUAKMtA3kR/cyIeU8wreZ+ok9P+OR+jibLPuax36J TMS4SoRi54RE5zeGYqjCQGJ3ukp/iPg2M8O8Iwnf5RicJPiIvX5E9mbGiuDDzgAR5vzf Gj9NwT6Eo305LHx+ZDWuxTHE52ws30oSIcqB3adeJbSHgJLh2kgJc8X84FvA4dYb057E 5E7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53372uT1yE9bAHEHy4LiYfrreqXLCVr8H7hKK3p6xFFAZ9hJe5Fo 2n76qIYUWxQUWTr9R6bdKP4WZrPRvrs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziAaUxHDv6VhnYYgRUxyGu5LHK1v5qsHos+SvfYFFiAddSl2QC0MfJLEtbDkK2ibW0Zk3/mA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2158:: with SMTP id v24mr1209817wml.151.1613740358728; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:12:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm11346730wmq.36.2021.02.19.05.12.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:12:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k0r4tduc.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265246 Archived-At: On 19.02.2021 14:57, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Then that command doesn't sound like it should be tagged with any modes. At least in theory, if the way "modes" tag set is transparent, these tags could be updated each time when a new CC Mode is loaded. > But is there a reason the modes don't derive from a common ancestor? That's not for me to answer.