From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with debug-on-entry in the Lisp debugger. Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:26:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87sm37n2bv.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87is42c8yp.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110414868 25232 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2005 00:34:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 01:34:28 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Bd9-0002Zc-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Brv-0002kf-LX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Bps-00020E-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Bpi-0001uc-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:47:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Bpe-0001se-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1D9BVX-0000Il-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1D9BV6-0001dI-Hh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:26:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.60 ([207.167.42.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:26:04 +0100 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:26:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.60 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34389 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34389 Richard Stallman wrote: > This is not the part of Emacs that is important to improve. > Hackers tend to focus their attention on the parts of Emacs > that make it seem more elegant in programmers' terms, > but this doesn't make Emacs more powerful or a better editor. Maybe not now, but an elegant rewrite may enable changes to make Emacs more powerful and better in the future. -- Kevin Rodgers