From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Hori Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cannot open termcap database Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:22:40 -0800 Message-ID: References: <200912041717.nB4HHe8H008078@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <83zl5yk158.fsf@gnu.org> <83iqclkana.fsf@gnu.org> <200912051105.nB5B53wL016307@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <83fx7pk2jj.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6l87brq.fsf@gnu.org> <873a3grxtv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83ws0s6ton.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264656181 24043 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2010 05:23:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alinsoar@voila.fr, Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mathias.dahl@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 28 06:22:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaMqD-0004DA-BH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:22:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36086 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaMqC-0000wn-Di for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaMq8-0000wC-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaMq3-0000vs-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46945 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaMq3-0000vp-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:57050) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NaMq2-0008Ig-7E; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so254585pwj.26 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:22:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EECrDorK/41s5SfzVyqk7ltSWCKV3jRfA4vQj4nD0II=; b=wTN5PQ67y2Oetl+8iSS5judizdsjg6pgCH5HdiI09ZCdWX8+FEiTqSQh7kmZRAsYBU P3Om/n2ZAITgCELumBTiETxp/joP+d3fNUFYaMnsE5ri6oIA+pxw91qGu9BZknPgbZhy 28JmeqPySVTKSMZ9UJfL9/4F3weuINe2nbu5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X7xnm8gbMugJe/uDgiqylzm6DUV/1zxNF9Hd8ttq2povDPD38FeR1Q5XP4M3iGaBjA VUgtq9B9V0TMe5m2epcckP+Mgf7tMfwAS8zkTDrLTHotDYZR2Oj9N6RJN6pVrum+auGK hISN2dQa9Ku7a9luuuQniuhRq+uLJ4cAqlu3A= Original-Received: by 10.114.44.9 with SMTP id r9mr3984780war.179.1264656161019; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:22:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ws0s6ton.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120544 Archived-At: This happens on Ubuntu Karmic (9.10) as well with Gnome2 as X. ... just wanted to bring this topic to attention again. On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Chong Yidong >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, alinsoar@voila.fr, dann@ics.uci.edu, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 emacs-devel@gnu.org, mathias.dahl@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:55:40 -0500 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > No one commented. =A0Should I do this now, or should I wait for the >> > release branch to be cut? >> >> I'd prefer to wait till we branch. > > Will do. > > >