From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] (icomplete-vertical-mode): Add support for affixations and, annotations Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:40:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zgwlb4xc.fsf@gmail.com> <617d06ca-27bf-2ae8-26eb-1042123499d3@daniel-mendler.de> <87pmxhb1rs.fsf@gmail.com> <23510125-37b9-e87e-3590-5322f44772ce@daniel-mendler.de> <87a6olazff.fsf@gmail.com> <93d2cfe9-bae8-bf94-486f-7569aa31491d@daniel-mendler.de> <874kesj6k6.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgwkhrmi.fsf@gmail.com> <83f4eb63-3299-bfe7-77f9-0fc19403b966@daniel-mendler.de> <875yz7ivik.fsf@gmail.com> <63683aaa-3d72-31cb-9c86-9917b12d1356@daniel-mendler.de> <877djngnxi.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8606"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Juri Linkov , dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 11:41:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llTYp-00022k-8d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:41:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTYo-0003wy-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTXz-0002KV-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:40:23 -0400 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([2a01:4f8:121:346::180]:34645 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTXx-0004Yc-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:40:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DmaUFb09s3/HFvGCNgLfvMfW1eGKEmhW+2ZLvMV0TmM=; b=hgRyWyfD6Z2l0lgHWfRnhJdDJe 3V4mj0yJNWIGlEPRgJIxsX8NSaS9HMm2rGvRw1yDOHjoy1RCDMS3YKk4uvDLDgHX/MG+4dABtQG/g 6Q166Cd/3uZJ4nYNqSVaK7Od3OHNvKwr1+/pgkOfRG62VyktR81cO0coL+4scKueM7eQ=; In-Reply-To: <877djngnxi.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:121:346::180; envelope-from=mail@daniel-mendler.de; helo=mail.qxqx.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269845 Archived-At: On 5/25/21 11:31 AM, João Távora wrote: > I agree that a single point would be nice to have, but we can't get rid > of annotation-function because it's been here for a good long while. > And affixation function has some drawbacks. So one of: > > (1) fix affixation-function's drawbacks (i.e. make it a function of a > single completion) I am fine with that. > (2) introduce a new function, call it decoration-function of > foobarbazing-function I am fine with that too as long as the `affixation-function` is then removed. You could also call this a renaming, since `decoration-function` better reflects the generality of the new functionality. > (3) improve annotation-function's capabilities. I am fine with that too of course. Daniel