From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jonathan Lange" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:10:46 +1100 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <87skyvmfi0.fsf@red-bean.com> <200803140111.m2E1BdwB005843@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <873aqu139h.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205471464 10525 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2008 05:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jason Earl" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 14 06:11:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ja2CX-0004it-LC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:11:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja2By-0002jT-9D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:10:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja2Bu-0002jK-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja2Bs-0002j0-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja2Bs-0002ix-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja2Br-0006jp-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so3993648fkx.10 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=OLbHmPyl9g7yQNOJToE6GXdwD/aJu6MhW+YHFZBjNEk=; b=hbA3PZmzAINuZg1nMNQhBAIX/pk4CGZRDGWd8MUIb4AP4mvDApOFKTzAYLqWxIQKtAVydBvRp8wR59hbxyF4YclhDpUIpwDIR49iBuLv+oARaHd1r2QsMYBb3x/I+YXV9HVlYuXKIH1D3IyK6uUFpqLjYkCP0IcBxqtO0CgGGT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=jE2wQ8HjYFXH0PZYgVKegm2FL+feU9oegRpNbdtlSw2dnZdDDZGmgy9AsaJrLi4y1raKSodk6kppgZDqzZDloWzQbBNGFXf3mmD2qr5JxxgTT6sahTI9Tu+yhcS4msvh5Js3Kt9t6EAdCILEHoRz9p29NLO89O0EO7OutW88z68= Original-Received: by 10.78.171.20 with SMTP id t20mr29300797hue.24.1205471446114; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.149.7 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <873aqu139h.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 694d8a65444d2b34 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92485 Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jason Earl wrote: > > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > BTW, how fast is "bzr annotate" supposed to be? > > > > time bzr annotate vc.el >& /dev/null > > 133.673u 2.392s 2:23.78 94.6% 0+0k 39864+16io 1pf+0w > > > > The similar command for Emacs CVS HEAD: > > time cvs annotate vc.el >& /dev/null > > 0.250u 0.064s 0:03.22 9.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w > > > > Thanks a lot for doing all this! > > That's about how long it took on my machine as well. > Bazaar recently made annotate slower while making a lot of other operations much faster. I haven't been following it closely, but I know that John Arbash Meinel has been working hard on bringing annotate up to speed. Expect significant improvements soon. jml