From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:32 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y63sjj.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <29a6c120-f260-0ea3-f5e0-1d3dd6323d09@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="42287"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 20:16:00 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKQrI-000AtH-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 20:16:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKQrH-0005qL-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKQk9-0007sd-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKQk7-0008Ko-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:41968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKQk7-0008GD-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF17160068; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ySb26__f1qJx; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286651600C7; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Wvhke5xgG-mR; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFC79160068; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:08:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29a6c120-f260-0ea3-f5e0-1d3dd6323d09@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246350 Archived-At: On 4/2/20 11:59 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > The basic slowness of Emacs over the past years is a direct consequenc= e > of that policy. How many users is that true for? When Emacs is slow for me, it's usually = because=20 of very long lines. Is that the same issue, or a different one? On 4/3/20 9:23 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > >=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Stefan "whose = fastest machine has an Intel i3-4170" >=20 > martin "on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+" Is that the Black Edition 5000+ or the regular one? The Black Edition was= quite=20 the thing in 2007. :-) -- Paul "on an AMD Phenom II X4 910e" circa 2010