From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: printing.el again Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <419779C4.50909@ig.com.br> <871xew44v1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <41990B75.1080603@ig.com.br> <41994FFB.2060308@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100616494 16855 80.91.229.6 (16 Nov 2004 14:48:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 16 15:48:05 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CU4cm-0002hq-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4lX-0002X3-HX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4lO-0002Wt-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4lO-0002Wa-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU4lO-0002WP-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CU4cA-0006gQ-Tf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CU4c9-0001Ir-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:25 +0100 Original-Received: from iwi190.iwi.uni-sb.de ([134.96.72.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:25 +0100 Original-Received: from angeli by iwi190.iwi.uni-sb.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: iwi190.iwi.uni-sb.de Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SMTw7wU64TXfUjs60HgDPCsxCP8= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29926 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29926 * Stefan (2004-11-16) writes: > Actually, I don't think optimizations should be particularly mentioned. > The interesting part of optimizing (featurep 'xemacs) is that it eliminates > spurious warnings. There are other ways to get the same effect, such as > what is done with (if (fboundp 'foo) ...) where the test is not optimized > away, but where warnings are selectively prevented. Is it planned to recognize (and (fboundp 'foo) ...) and (and (boundp 'foo) ...) as well? In AUCTeX we have a lot of them and consequently a lot of warnings from the byte compiler. -- Ralf