From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <44e78be7-be8b-3756-805b-e1455516ef2c@gmx.at> <7f0ebc82.7f9.16fcf69ab7e.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7237c15a-8e6c-316d-8d0f-cf15a6c58d14@gmx.at> <619a81b3-d89e-dde0-0cbf-a42c45fcde03@yandex.ru> <93b0c6f4-74e5-854d-3bad-a0b994f83e89@yandex.ru> <8f8f03e2-39d3-af46-361d-2d5060d15217@gmx.at> <56e8b49f-bdb8-d97c-11ca-01612b5c7e5c@yandex.ru> <52546096-e66e-7851-d256-255f8374f3a6@gmx.at> <9badd57f-5f63-7ee6-7ade-9ac473391527@yandex.ru> <28a49043-c99e-3c12-354e-5ebd524ac760@gmx.at> <282ee9bc-d623-8bfd-16a9-9b1068553205@yandex.ru> <8c4c37c2-bf98-ff74-2b71-c87f8996bdfe@gmx.at> <11d7655e-83fc-f185-fa78-624ec5505d24@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="16684"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Dmitry Gutov , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 19:07:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixEDp-0004J3-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:07:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixEDo-0001KK-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixEAz-0000J1-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixEAy-0005WO-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:44401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixEAy-0005Uc-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:04:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1580407449; bh=PpdcK6ACS8ddatqQaLzfkIg6L4OdWh3jxpOd6eN9+zc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iU7sED+TPgj7rI0FG/XlYhBzqDVlupj0irdHzYdP52sfHE6EPEma10Jnx1zcdHxMp +jl1+h5+qyUyvFiOmAktzC3NBnXNOxorzsfBB0mH2iaDfuUMU7FXwBfJJWYIAD+yQs f97k9BP1yDTQNZ0lP0+gQfrrtFE0GTN55DTHhq7k= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M7K3i-1iw6dh13s4-007lNb; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:04:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <11d7655e-83fc-f185-fa78-624ec5505d24@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Jtp2WafcxN1TgX54rDMzCX9ZDj4EnW5VioiFUSeMBtdDRSmPFVd 3Ea0f2iHjkW6wegcFSpMcxHDX+4nIeVwWYOcwk0Gho+brOc3SLiKF9ULGdgNtr5Zli5JkF4 rXgqJhHKs53MEgo+U9RAALmj7KAgHHQLleU3WH68jVNSxp5qe5QjvxPZFK7rO9T5mncUlAE tiLHiuBHWHRODQBCPIM9w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:gQolAWK1ns4=:evlipF/eYX9yky37PoopDN mb8S1nji9QYPS+9ZdSHGlL4WH8Y0Z8jqmnKOvoabfTJPjLRjJ0p0Pqhtr0jicIHdCpivqzgcT 3FYUiWo9rab60nOIczg7ZNiFc2e0O+lfR43o9XgXoSG42sP7Ap9GMSysEF1Lpf9zNWGUIxAlV cv9Gr71MwBEc1itzUTbJ6utsisQI09IyLYGDq/p+dtTXxYUclY/evnOeC7L8LVIbEECQnkwgO dhZNue5GH8UCef3NYd6FCUwWWv3tjxjX1z3Ce1q0wS/SMRimpOv5hPQv4zkOc4Gbit4D+ltf7 ce30nni/XthoPi8IH+T+AVhwBRPtSDW/65itc0wBulsCppw6LnF4Oe6YPuhOw5TSS2C+7e9n3 WIGZbEJyUY09Fr6R2cTx3APvzDgjxihuDwWsbh47tLyrBvug3yKlBa1ILsEmOBP5ImyCCEvBJ jZ5rRtHR+tx0NuBkJx9tIkPSwPqPEVFcumDzo1UzIvMEQpl1ny+CsDe0iN7X6fDOPqUn64l57 JsioW3sABUtoizXg8/nIXkEweK1r+aaRynk7N0l31hC/x6b0eDw/sHp9Ds9B3FmCD5wCHTzBs LsFhI9p8EKyudED2vIeIz/29c4YBfvy+Uy+q/mQl6HxtutwivBafB7iAX1IIXA3wY5QG0Zu7F FGiUaDGXlRc0OamIXLonVWrNvTqgcmC7++Fs1FNuu1wPKRIzTl+Pf/Lyq4oTX5YkY5Bf0nuyn buaUJDiCFUisYCDedXrf/bGrrlzBJ3Ep0QdXTbk+kzbO2l2nK1nFFq6rK9P5Fgjh8idQKTPb X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244775 Archived-At: > Before I do that... there's something I failed to notice before: the > frame *does* get resized, in a sense. At least X seems to think so, > but Emacs doesn't. In a sense, yes. > Notice the white area of the same height as the child frame hiding the > text in the parent frame on the attached screenshot. Also note that > the yellow background didn't help: the area is white. The yellow background allows to discern what Emacs thinks about the child frame (yellow) from what it should think (white). Whether that white area was cleared by the WM or by Emacs itself is not clear to me. It should have been Emacs because well, why should the WM clear it? > This only happens with xterm.diff applied, never without it. It's similar to the old behavior of X where I also saw those cleared areas. martin