From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trying out GitLab (was Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:04:22 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87poddqb5y.fsf@gnu.org> <871spsveyw.fsf@petton.fr> <87van4tzu9.fsf@petton.fr> <871spsla9r.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871sprb394.fsf@gmail.com> <640b51d5-9786-358c-985e-c55023acd75c@yandex.ru> <838tjzkuvs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499515544 11284 195.159.176.226 (8 Jul 2017 12:05:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 12:05:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/54.0 Cc: avarab@gmail.com, tzz@lifelogs.com, toon@iotcl.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 08 14:05:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dToUP-0002II-DV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 14:05:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dToUS-0005pg-U0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dToUM-0005pN-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dToUJ-0005uh-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f178.google.com ([209.85.128.178]:32903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dToUJ-0005tU-5R; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r103so79482609wrb.0; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:05:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ij3FmXzWFXH0bkyJPgHKyncigUnZ5Kf9r8XDx+NgB7w=; b=lis9p9OQg7nA8MHFu6WkRgT53egnwSEMDNOEcJL2TQ9HS0btHKMGoIC2CHL+5WSlg3 +UNfwlHtJQwxBNsggkrRUxMV0Gu3lIHdodnEov2xZJJG+0VDDUx7ORfNj9stdC1m+enN /ho/+GhKuurtUq0T0Ss7buzbHMho8btrhPRYaMTXhwrJXQmLR2iVEYNfPNkevrfuso2t 13Ji1hZOIhuNx0ijOtiVQZdYWq4VPO1MVR7bvuC4T/yc1H+pBuDppb8luEpi91Cc2bd3 8redK1xLs/iLETkoX21aRkG/oyq5Yr789OvEKHSvmmRHfDB5mW27MiJXwYR+k3+SwUas QfRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ij3FmXzWFXH0bkyJPgHKyncigUnZ5Kf9r8XDx+NgB7w=; b=hs7dltrUOgmiP8fXRTONdAD8dW8vhXIKQfn0xgQ072uk3THOgFbJxPBeqL9HPc4jso rMdZDYOfSOdEFV3l8luQ6MGV11bLCMOhiyLm+CA00jU0nv9boaNNtd6ihMxJu1a+EjBQ qqMqLNSIglXYTPrM92gykYpX15LC8U74Bpp5fuBz6wqZjByuSQZElNOMvlBbu79dk++k wMZN/DDZtgT/s/uijCqPWkO9Oi5NGG8BG4uheKuKS3nqSciB+aCC30RXtufGQqJ1lCvf 5C7SlO3reZJOuVdy/65TMwyV3lVsoHIHlqeUslKa7c4Zqole3PMjfb/yDhSc979CmArI MZ6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112THQMf+gVeZIGX4VcFlsGQCXMHGlb4U4II2Jev6v0UOfSnvO9U Orj5KZWNxT4TX39Kdzg= X-Received: by 10.28.143.208 with SMTP id r199mr2120993wmd.86.1499515465608; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm10125267wrx.26.2017.07.08.05.04.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:04:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838tjzkuvs.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.178 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216319 Archived-At: On 7/8/17 2:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > It's actually more than that: patches submitted to Emacs need to > conform to our coding and various other standards: include > properly-formatted commit log messages, documentation, and (where > appropriate) tests, etc. Patch review could require cleanup changes > etc. That doesn't negate the advantages of integrated solutions like GitLab, though. Emacs is not the only project with standards. We often enforce those via code review, and GitLab helps with that. > People who find this too much of an effort should perhaps describe > their solution without showing any actual code, so that someone else > could implement it. Relatedly, a friendlier bug tracker would go a long way as well.