From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Allow applying filters to summary consecutively Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:39:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87r0y8m5jc.fsf@autistici.org> <97ea4e2f08a17bc0197c@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21461"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrea.monaco@autistici.org, eliz@gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 02:19:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oukbr-0005NS-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 02:19:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ouiop-0000su-4I; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:24:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ouige-0005gN-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ouV0L-0007SY-8y; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 03:39:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1668415181; bh=79jnM8Zx7q2AyBbG/7yWna2sBLNPDR0DKSYPJKfbqfE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=0jajhLx2a90up1bFmxwXeziK7H/FXRNXuCz6jTKCHOQMeaOV03rKwKrMaFeOfJry3 Emjxhj4dS9zP8JrEYOcrATjvrnWxzHbczgieiirE1qSuRREZBzmbfgAg5y6XYL3jLs j9OmNKOCCqpCdbupq9M7k08+UJhQTfZCOJBLB0vYXVsBlWNJg4JTs58PIRmYWVdOsE 6KCO+wl70cePBxuS0KzH6PS8vQ50xiRz+JzOzeXlItCSoHGNqXQMTqpvgx/FBckBZs qD9fWz0lAQWdpNWmMfuL4NoWTlFTaE3oOPyj43Z0C24GdedvEKY4ujxvZjGolIF1Xe Xy0RuCuGTIRuA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299812 Archived-At: >> If I may, I would suggest something different: an option to query the >> user how they want the rmail-summary-by-* command to be applied: on the >> entire folder, to limit the existing summary, to extend the existing >> summary. > > The first of these three options is not useful -- to get that result, > just type q before the command. So there would be only two that are > needed: union and intersection. > A third option would be more natural, I think. After all, the first option is AFAIU the current effect of the rmail-summary-by-* command, they are applied on the entire folder and create a new summary. > > C-u would be a natural way to specify this. > C-u is already used by the rmail-summary-by-topic and rmail-summary-by-recipients commands for another purpose.