From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Python interactive navigation around nested functions Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:29:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lh21eq5c.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87eg7rdrj7.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87d1nbdqkn.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87twgick5w.fsf@secretsauce.net> <576DC0D4.5060304@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466969098 21185 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2016 19:24:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:24:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 21:24:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFfl-0002tb-L1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:24:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54979 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFfk-0000Mz-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFfe-0000Mu-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFfa-0000hf-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:54224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFfa-0000ha-3Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.12.189.219]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue004) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrXBZ-1bTn8Z0K6f-013JYz for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:24:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: <576DC0D4.5060304@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:H3pChbZZeM2aBIkseXD2MaPjvIyt5A9ByZyryfjniigwukN9Ion n79AyOrhEfNBxOiqEUmXmo7EQIlklseLkO4fSk6b6GFzneSMIuKD8cy/ZdAop33Ys64UGCZ HHIgsKheHFUvEdHVXuIsCrjtjctMNLF5zhotsMTupvnk3Jh3NjDIG7dxv4KmJFe0myTsZVu 2MtJ4gmvINHw2xdnF/sUw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ED/TabsOw5I=:qPXX4FHzKsD+8BlrLK5xiV VkMrZWEdRJzBuPPrnEldZnv/QO3Pb8KOj8A9qQjviOu17kuor7Pav6BEnsE5b5vi7GIpmJ1VP TteAI0gnudwmZFmNh1j6WGIazNG+RTkyvX1W3CxUGRuj5MadZsYdgyqQHz5GbTsQTn9iR5Qao fiasywYxoSOAJjPyOlmXyZm9vbFLu2CIRioJW2WS1RTbF+J4bRedkeuOMBFHPMSe34OX/a7iE KKpIjzyPrGrZDqHRvmwBf99qkmZvBr08YckTfaVu9GXl/f3lxXVTkOtNOViGhluFZ9TGERoVr Chfd4O38OP5QUF3KH/t/AH5n9PGe+iQMID+ZxAPku8SsBSNa1P0CBFbUYAylfTxXHf+1KwDYQ aYjw+Uyz0DWMM308CCV6o4XAjir4q8ddsDXFjXe8kSKubrlSZCaGrKYqjscuKenimSM+gSAGl dBh//HcBmRqgaHcbPp13Uk3Ru3o5YkdHsGoHOEXNi7AsVW1RsGp399dgXz7BM8nXRND1KZh7I V/vpkLWZDVms1Qw80TglGYHigVS8eu+SlyH2/n7rn5DHZ7+6oYT6uNlloaFqJ55fM9cpD+g+e KG8wrGadZpSQU27bSBpbUEF9t5ixS861QfxfPrQ3Qexd3K3hBXSCQIjoyIvv19BPZfvsMj61n YKKAh2jTGqZ+rBCI34ILJJPJ9ZtZ50tOOYqLPdqIahcCTVhzdV43Px+2WUj/lj4yVEnesG2yQ Db8gxADWgNrrJtCT X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204781 Archived-At: On 25.06.2016 01:23, Clément Pit--Claudel wrote: > On 2016-06-24 18:10, Dima Kogan wrote: >> Yeah, I'd rather not proliferate multiple similar-yet-slightly-different >> behaviors, so I'll simply use my own python nav functions in my work if >> this gets rejected. > That would be too bad Not that much, as it displays another basic strength of Emacs. For me a major reason for preferring it over other tools, which might be smarter in detail. > ;.I think you're making a good point; and still the frustrating part with a python-specific fix is that C-M-a will have a different meaning depending on the programming language :/ > Nope. A function definition as displayed here is pretty comparable with its role in Emacs Lisp. A case would be def/class distinction - which is not at stake.