From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: thumbs.el and transparency Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:38:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17366.53124.274532.548329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87slqvfobk.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5hy43b6.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0b8lwhw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139759893 20338 80.91.229.2 (12 Feb 2006 15:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 16:58:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Jc3-0000W8-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:58:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Jc1-0002Xb-8u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F8IMu-0002Ro-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F8IMp-0002QJ-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8IMm-0002Po-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.82.199] (helo=xproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F8IR1-00060G-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:42:43 -0500 Original-Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s13so493712wxc for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:38:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BsPsdm6I19pALo+JvAF6yViwdApp75fVfc0fMDsguUrDvAwztnL906Odl/c3KyrPuNX/pUUt8UpcrGPmAMosNME5sEcTXnHF1S0SrWxxAtRNd21kmQGNyQPU6HQa+041NJARdnogz8PJiPnt3rjpLnifY4nWr+1nw6W0+mFI0Ds= Original-Received: by 10.70.67.5 with SMTP id p5mr1482270wxa; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:38:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.70.62.9 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:38:18 -0800 (PST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50403 Archived-At: > tumme.el is larger than most Lisp source files, but quite a few > are larger. If you want to split it into 2 or 3 files, please do. > But only do that if you feel that makes it clearer and more > maintainable. 570+ lines are Commentary and History, but yes, it has 2000+ lines of code which is quite much. I will think about a split, see if there are things that could be moved to make it easier to maintain, but I don't see it as an urgent thing to do right now.