From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:07:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com> <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7204"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: nicola.manca85@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 13:08:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFbTz-0001mG-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:08:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFbTy-0007Xf-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFbSw-0006Tm-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::236]:41908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFbSu-0005g4-Mu; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id y4so19450869ljk.8; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 04:07:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XhYLwqkH12GGnuTgtVSeMnQOTIcXcI71WzjFC5M3yMo=; b=tGMWAstpbEfDxOIk4LenBcblrZh2Wu7bpvQ/8LwzVYja41rdV0zQ6nnT9tbs2gy8yZ nPnRLKUp1cYAQdxxeMhsTP/hz1s9hajQhAZHlxM4ddhP6cz/CHSjyIFTKzHVPDYF4LtQ yBITPuPhzq8Qis7dHRPICdvYCaMjINtZt+4jHiyL8vc5CliFPa9pLpY1EEgIRXEabFOu Fw2kHb/SBg6Adxdg9YL7M5nuaphA7+mLcL5ywtgodBdnLtJb7o0B0CZNYOFq2P8ZoW4y 3y/Ft2Ssc/kFOsmk3jGLV+eeccDB+UULjzcGX9PiPGvW6Aa5xgHGnbHV1ez2MqWAmaM0 mb0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XhYLwqkH12GGnuTgtVSeMnQOTIcXcI71WzjFC5M3yMo=; b=Fvc/HuekZzyhA6C+iFU8hGHmt3cN3Zi6CoqVz6WGzIDE+1jkNqMqMCj31YtF5GaWsy Ux5nmX2fLtqF2m/02UmTK1dNPpuSQTzuH+GHTRb1TYIuzrHN4sxqt4xx8kMD6rlvTQEm HeQcWGTjwdw2K3BKw8esPrkbvIFsVFmrwWLhI44yxkrx46hrogl17CRPSZHw7jeReyQx CZpmRLZJJrySv9b8Q6IvZyC8aHyXWhIJdvOnzdA5JlcEV0EWER6vCwZQoxJwMf4IJ/yK RJqlCXmdl9D1DFzv3ix2CD2egNaFBiQpe4SVnfi5+CX8Nmn55OpzyuRVF+fCROV5qWZ+ VyBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V+JtmQSN4R1xWDZq1vcXva03Z393Be4JTnFb5JETHr+dQ5+UJ kzzTpEo6FQasXxgZxrET8xS7Dw/KmgU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxH4AgHhha1ENKRoOkJd4bcMrWg3BkPco5UangVpROHfVRr03qoGZQWXHd3eJde9lxeTknPww== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:980c:: with SMTP id a12mr11613534ljj.26.1599563226342; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 04:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([94.229.108.16]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm9861325ljg.111.2020.09.08.04.07.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 04:07:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::236; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x236.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.626, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254718 Archived-At: On 08.09.2020 09:18, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > Why on earth would we do that? Emacs undo > > is superior. > > undo-tree is superior. > > That would make Emacs unusable for the majority of Emacs users. "Unusable" is a strong word, but indeed it's a more complex UI than many users need, probably. Hence my actual suggestion.