From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13uxug5.fsf@gnu.org> <41e3f343-816f-d2db-6575-6ef43d54957f@yandex.ru> <838tecuqjb.fsf@gnu.org> <83609etizl.fsf@gnu.org> <83wp1ts123.fsf@gnu.org> <1e8587a7-c98b-5183-3cfd-8e1034443f44@yandex.ru> <83shchrwia.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgi9ruo8.fsf@gnu.org> <01c15d4e-566b-3b7f-c4e6-6f199ba5bcc3@yandex.ru> <89c4a839-a124-a1a8-5cf9-583baf2b4dd6@yandex.ru> <7e4799f9-b640-f363-5ecc-3b83eeada292@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513338861 669 195.159.176.226 (15 Dec 2017 11:54:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/58.0 To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 15 12:54:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePoZE-0008Gd-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:54:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePoZK-00060W-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePoZ9-00060O-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePoZ5-0006QA-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:40438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePoZ5-0006J9-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:54:07 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f206so16987636wmf.5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:54:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kbY7dfSlZxcVePWENFQ9T/sKFSowrZe0ic4i3Em1m/4=; b=afJxqShYjv94+nn2sfeSqCo11t7PWdXEC0oLk+umPVaUE6Y+a14DYZVWfixDG3a43y 7R2ntk37IjNzwlna7CTD2v7ZO0FRhwOD8QQoBLboAB1b1V+GvrM0WrkXe8S6Ekoy2zb4 VNyWrtiHijkqYt95hv0iCXFkEoXYdRti5V5hkvqxrhI7VSrf6TXni4CezmVGO3q6NVFO yk43E3dB+WhRO5hvEFD91eqCVE34J6uo7dWB+6kZu0ij15SRNyICys3Xr93HXMto1lbm N+zfcn7lKR7kET4qncIkg/5nUazbU80/Au9lGD2LHLaTgeLHG4kIzyrqumWdGUZVC30A ExJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kbY7dfSlZxcVePWENFQ9T/sKFSowrZe0ic4i3Em1m/4=; b=W+EdFYWTuvABPQqoN/3sZ4okOqqDjv6sAgKmUQ8xn7JZlcaVgwlIzAOlzTqHk4PEwb 98jT93vjwQ5c0dvuHYlHNs/Eh9dwesrnkg7xMlCmNjDiNtYlvY3D4WvWrhYxNfKbvS1e 7mEOWnLsOLLOrsBMlsOUNuETA/9HTeU6zy1pUv95qpuWo47r/jrzzBhaK3h4F8AlC91B /RZVa5h4dC9kigHJXmT7RC86UmjAoYwWpyEaj/7lgzBiTiGM8NmNng1uoYWVkzGKVWvH Qe0kI6icDhel3ZWd9HDi7R37R4xAojFFoPiH0CsmNRc444JJwz0K6qI4RW1MdbTgfAwn 7e0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mL72YulpBysEa2jqK9jYIZmA8Y+naWbjfzpNiLAcqnz/7X0Eem9 yK3EHgntoXNU5b1OFx37VoIxw4sk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouVeE3ZyHinDTCChOGCd5C83Jie3xblL2WwYLeZqk7bfvC33jHN4V3XZH+m00paG7zbmLxpog== X-Received: by 10.80.179.137 with SMTP id s9mr16866377edd.164.1513338846050; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:54:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w51sm5397168edd.84.2017.12.15.03.54.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:54:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221093 Archived-At: On 12/14/17 4:32 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > [ I don't think in those terms: with the new convention, > an indent-line-function still can call widen as much as it wants, > it just doesn't need to and probably doesn't want to. ] How should we word it, then? "shouldn't" is not a far cry from "should avoid narrowing" which I used in the indentation section. Any better way to say that, as well? > No, indeed, it doesn't talk about the different uses of narrowing. > It probably should say something, tho, especially w.r.t this new convention. Suggestions welcome, if any. If you want to see it in Emacs 26, at least.