From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 55ec674: * lisp/multifile.el: New file, extracted from etags.el Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 08:04:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180922154639.23195.66360@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180922154640.9D58220310@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <54108dbc-9d12-06ff-3f1d-151118e9b234@yandex.ru> <87sgyi69iw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871s62zg8l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545977241 24164 195.159.176.226 (28 Dec 2018 06:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 06:07:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 28 07:07:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gclIi-0006B8-UN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:07:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gclKp-0007Jx-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 01:09:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gclJm-0007JA-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 01:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gclFg-0007pn-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 01:04:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::230]:36680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gclFg-0007ox-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 01:04:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id g11-v6so17891491ljk.3 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:04:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IkMsDwrpTANlN45u0J8kG/d6zT/TU4GwDiXX6YxgCY=; b=ZKFgY5PjzS5amBXK9LM6Gpvx8QI2QxLd7cTrcLvG3QGqB3C4D+6XvJ9FTJUs6dlRn1 UqkHzwDzRbzevDReXxPIhk2yZRHckrRdaBCG8LrTR6uRVpu29jXhCpppjVND6wYltcLN 38A7d5RDS3z2+SJaAaneVmeXsum/rfMkWifRMrBx58bRU8yDLHaDbiMXP5AGQanoY6I4 hfX3F+a3g3utlFzXgrcSu315XemcpIbcS58I11Ud12oydOCyb3o7saZgCXm9VRhoF7kZ Y6e6kW/1CqulY3Pf2N6HYfrFIvtedZraDyY/Zm6ltYxr2PakRJ8V/YPP6n3a+NBjZYej SfDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IkMsDwrpTANlN45u0J8kG/d6zT/TU4GwDiXX6YxgCY=; b=IlNXx4VG0XHs0Pg1mxNTNjCGWA/woc3nzek+KY6HUX2RGZV246m7yCEe1XvTmp35CP 3jcE8z/j3qkFB7xiwd+EhEd5nvpsQz2cRBmDSpqY+OfyxeqBj1M+Yj26UcOh8SVn6CPu 3+/vcxd5GnI1puJfRL/1cFsktAceHoq9A4fR9n98b2hK+A10eiwPe5m7NS/a1YpEW+0r CRsOWfYy5QkBUXrt9+3zB6Sg3ogR1n/IZbU8qFrZCTFVG7ncyMUsISZfdN2cuv6fL29U mxrun139fJNublhpGcCjVUNURstkYyrhRx5ONyZmKBGwopiN7wN+d5coDCSHuiqnW4n7 guDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfbW7FF+b0qFz8vbkRp0B0sDvBGLN3rwCTOtJEA1gpGLuAeC0cr bOBHnLzQJ5QXxw4UMS2WDcwo7DHxDJw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4OE7PtHpwvYs8GvtufMozMS0lqA/6sBQdpZM79XZDAhnnV2s7nAW/WK0mE3yeaM8m38wxJkw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:80d3:: with SMTP id r19-v6mr14771264ljg.151.1545977047008; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:04:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.174] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v5-v6sm8452595lje.78.2018.12.27.22.04.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:04:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871s62zg8l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232014 Archived-At: On 28.12.2018 1:45, Juri Linkov wrote: > Rather it completes on path components too, not only on file names. > Makes more difficult to match part of the file name when the same substring > occurs in the path. But base file names can also have duplicates, right? > Either prefix multifile- or project- is fine, but not both at the same time. > Or better just shorten to multi-. We already have multi-isearch (not > supporting project yet). OK, let me put it another way: "multifile" is just a package that implements a particular UI. It is in no way synonymous with "project". Maybe a better name for it would be something like bufferloop (suggestions welcome). >> Does M-x project-find-regexp work in the same situation? > > I see that M-x project-find-regexp is like occur, so a better name would be > M-x project-occur. I can see where you're coming from, but we've already discussed that it has different behavior from Occur. And it uses different data sources. I agree that some unification might be in order, but naming things the same won't cut it.