From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Deiconifying GTK frames on GNOME shell Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:45:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87e1a3cb-430d-ff6d-6244-6e20bbdced94@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 To: martin rudalics , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 07 02:49:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNPIZ-0000lA-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 02:49:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55002 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNPIY-00035X-EQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNPEb-0000dz-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::432]:42876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNPEY-0001fl-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id q11so11909080wrr.9 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hD107zVPi26ku6YUhp6/QfTT3ixl2j2MJVxDnnm++Yo=; b=nVL9dZo7nHR4lPMFRDSm6w0sf0Sl4wkQ3v8IIo0etYxSFYZKtVXqAk72zFaZq8+eSS g+YgB6fotQ14LY28qJgHj0EEfu3i8+dyewhcrZ7kQb/o3yuevGticMY1DAKc90Pe/tq+ F/HXPkHfPhjaJt+lMJw+r3niprElazJDlMEubRoxxGFS2QCfGfx/+7rnbyoIqNwVmiFW 0rN86svi7DEGIAj4Sy+NtmXrva9Fn5vBhJmRt19HOR7qloHBmwYlB8+/7JmH2DcO0/EU ZvGDa2zmAvM7D7HeiunyIlg8Y+o555caKrV1iuoU4LByh5C1nmW0ROwGpGqB+XNghcoP HLNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hD107zVPi26ku6YUhp6/QfTT3ixl2j2MJVxDnnm++Yo=; b=INbEoRUqgBdNJDYDcOc3vTsRnfcd4kNpgfLiaaIUoiQDQyzPGjok5viq9Y+Pt9Hjq8 IvL9iHaV4aSjVg44vHPYWXoNVamcuQ5sEDAyCyjyLQ3QOn3zcos+KBnuYxSFSyGqQ32+ YkYIqHq9JvEnKMQhYj4K7OJMiKD+Fkoih3GrL7Z9LLnxbbe6LUm7npwKxsZ4EugVMBAP cxwHzrOjpipFjqPchki2J/bRwuhWI27S8zdLcGkKT9Q261xKsOSXOWVH2BNFCp9kiOkv X4ntJgpkcAZ3j3Xf3aK0u/A2hy3BdJVoNSwCTGnSFsTvY9JIZcm2Rgh+whF5mkoopJW2 eSAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uCAO8Cl1x3n9lZe3AybjEeQz2g8/5oJsMNIzqMjvpam+9Qwyy 0Xu4oROtRb2NumDHPZTZSh0Lu5Z59Ts= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiKd/x6YMlX0Gyrvsr49VvRaGOvRufzcPqydn4DmobVqbqZRCSoTkkXOPr/nL8P3l6daGE0g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9f4a:: with SMTP id f10mr15735546wrg.384.1630975505319; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm858960wmj.28.2021.09.06.17.45.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:45:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87e1a3cb-430d-ff6d-6244-6e20bbdced94@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::432; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x432.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.332, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274181 Archived-At: On 06.09.2021 11:32, martin rudalics wrote: > Even after doing (make-frame-visible frame)? Yup. > Just in case can you confirm that the earlier mentioned > > (1) In xterm.c swap the calls to > >       gtk_widget_show_all (FRAME_GTK_OUTER_WIDGET (f)); >       gtk_window_deiconify (GTK_WINDOW (FRAME_GTK_OUTER_WIDGET (f))); > > (2) When trying to deiconify an iconified frame make it invisible first >     and only then make it visible. > > hack would work? Yes, that seems to work. Consistently. If I don't do (1), BTW, I can do (2) twice, and that also makes the frame visible. Meaning (make-frame-invisible frame) (make-frame-visible frame) (make-frame-invisible frame) (make-frame-visible frame) If I do (1), then doing (2) only once is sufficient.