From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Beyond release Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:14:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5254d43b-39dd-7ac2-03d7-349e6d710a6b@online.de> <577135CD.1040605@gmail.com> <8a06c531-eac2-cfd5-eab0-6bf197e8c3e0@online.de> <57714BA1.8030506@gmail.com> <7c2ab4b6-4781-e553-53f3-52fca9b647fc@online.de> <539b4bff-899a-1bb9-90cf-568c083ce0bb@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467094331 11459 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2016 06:12:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:12:11 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 08:11:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHmFV-0000I4-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHmFP-000487-NS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHmE9-0002CD-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHmE4-0003vL-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:63304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHmE4-0003vD-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.6.147.237]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDPKv-1b8AvA3A8z-00Grxj; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:10:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: <539b4bff-899a-1bb9-90cf-568c083ce0bb@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:a4o4lyGGDhqMe5PQJ0nACYF/LdFLMefHHSoKpwz8WnqqSiA2Gua RjVsA9pKSSIvWh2aCWxuB71BMKWYDYvxYEpaSAsoAq7d1gf4WxY9mXIF9AH4+1dqrsgBpwF yQwOZdAe0W+ucft5KKwa7ohftp00gnppPBSAl/ozMwUaSJJOgC3d40RgAYYlrikdYgVDUCn 4ljmQCHQR+ybDq5u3WqZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:T5kpacx27gI=:TwpqV/r3aU7hhRPBo8kTKZ lDQQtja1naQJHNqIAojux8Y3U0tsGov5JZedefqZn8Pdzt1yo3YB9I4dE6AiQRX1LkgMRYIYY AoUV0Ax3lmITKBk+p2gslCiojczJAGFM99A4qaLfLNgAuI9mApzWCNcykekAHs4cJHeBGZh3b OYo/B633PotC5KoVIjksXhfIxzA0rurXOvflq14q8ZnJMxzedVfq5it7EBCbZ2X1S9ZkOmfA1 lm5hoGpRxDpvJBbgu5QlesbGFe2MOm3bUqaitJpHIUFL4SI3/IOS6bGFraXHo94omoJwXqFfP QYytrJjV3k/nuj30w5xleeb0Mg+xF949cwRFxz0UT3xboAUtgd3v5P+q9N1HCSX37eLS7fKbk 5gW+br+wV9EOMk6UE8ixcX5NI0F0E83wh3P07n7HE24Gdjn6elf5L3lm38JSG/zYet+Z9z+87 sFKpCxhVSERHMq/UnOWi8cpmDkj0VOqhQSdwwpQPnujV37Nrn/Xq6iEE+7EGFDgyGhnFRdA15 Lf/gbbTDpPSc8UpJ8bXglY0hL//l6K3H6nseCEXa34Fu8wZQqprXnnFUdBu8uDtAFC7KpMyq5 ahspi8yAeuwPClbqeY28wKJ7E7nizApLvXVGe026Hjn5P98ECH2qtBenQ0x8/a8V+WZJjar+v CVpsjrXq/yaaY3FiQvS/w7Wk2z7XGWRf3UNTSuZyGW7qjavxyh6TLKavLp5L5J0sP8b8KYgsx P31/2QmCOnnXSv0f X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204848 Archived-At: On 27.06.2016 21:55, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 06/27/2016 09:10 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: > >> Not if you snip a relevant part. > > Everybody has read it already. > > Yes, syntax-ppss can be called recursively. It's not about that. It's about circular calls between syntax-propertize-function and syntax-ppss. > No, it's not proof that it's "slow", for any meaningful definition of > "slow". > >> However, when called from syntax-propertize-function, this certainly >> wont be null, then the propertize-branch is entered. Might the branches >> be simple bound wrong, i.e. reverse? > > How to report bugs effectively: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html A design flaw is not a bug yet, but might source a bunch of bugs. Please search for slowness and Emacs, you should receive enough entries which deserve thinking about.