unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Jason Spiro" <jasonspiro4@gmail.com>
To: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Binding F11 and F12 to buffer-switching and file-saving by default
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:43:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c241693f0701301243t1b3cac39uc206bb77d9fc78be@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ccd24b0701300343je99f637v7c45ef9b11d6420a@mail.gmail.com>

2007/1/30, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/30/07, Jason Spiro <jasonspiro4+news@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> > I define it as "the benefits to new Emacs users with no .emacs file
> > outweigh the costs."  IMO, it is important that new users enjoy Emacs
> > as soon as possible.  If they enjoy it, they will continue using it
> > forever.
>
> Well, I think an Emacs user, if he's to be an Emacs user for any
> significant amount of time, needs to learn to use the .emacs file
> sooner rather than later.
>
Correct.

> > That's OK. People without those keys can use C-x C-s and C-x b.
>
> Multiplying bindings for common commands adds confusion IMHO.
>
Hmm. Perhaps that is true. (To the rest of you: Do you agree?)

But M-x compile and M-x recompile have no default binding. Perhaps a
better answer, then, would be to bind them to some easy-to-press
combination of keys by default. And also to bind a fast
buffer-switching command to some key combination as well.

...
> Do you really consider `recompile' a basic command that most users
> *without* an .emacs file will need on a one-key binding?

I suspect that one of the most popular uses of Emacs is programming.

M-x recompile takes time to type. M-x <UpArrow><UpArrow><UpArrow> RET
is suboptimal because you must take your mind off your work for a
moment to watch the minibuffer until the proper history entry comes
up. IMO, a keybinding that all Emacs users could use, no matter what
machine they were using, would be better.

> > True, but it can be handy to have useful bindings preset by default.
>
> Yeah. The really difficult issue is deciding what are the useful bindings ;-)
>

Yes. I wonder if people have ever studied the issue, for example,
usability researchers.

> > So, do the benefits to newbies outweigh the costs?
>
> That's for others to decide.

Yes, but as Stefan mentions in his reply to this message, we should at
least bind F11 and F12 to *something*.

Cheers,
Jason

-- 
Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile.
I provide web and software development services businesses worldwide.
Call or email for a FREE 5-minute consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed.
+1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: info@jspiro.com / MSN: jasonspiro@hotmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-30 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-30  8:47 Binding F11 and F12 to buffer-switching and file-saving by default Jason Spiro
2007-01-30  8:59 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-01-30 10:52   ` Jason Spiro
2007-01-30 11:43     ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-01-30 20:43       ` Jason Spiro [this message]
2007-01-31  1:51         ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-01-31  1:55           ` Jason Spiro
2007-01-31  2:15             ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-01-31  7:52               ` Andreas Roehler
2007-01-31  7:47                 ` David Kastrup
2007-01-31 18:58             ` Jiri Pejchal
2007-02-01 12:35             ` Stephen Leake
2007-02-01 19:49               ` Ted Zlatanov
2007-01-31  2:19           ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-01 12:29             ` Stephen Leake
2007-01-31 16:51         ` Binding F11 and F12 to buffer-switching and file-saving bydefault Drew Adams
2007-02-01  0:08           ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-01 20:04             ` Ted Zlatanov
2007-01-30 20:27     ` Binding F11 and F12 to buffer-switching and file-saving by default Eli Zaretskii
2007-01-30 20:45       ` Jason Spiro
2007-01-30 20:25   ` Richard Stallman
2007-01-30 15:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-01-31 15:21   ` Stephen Leake
2007-02-01  3:47     ` Daniel Brockman
2007-02-01  1:09 ` JD Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c241693f0701301243t1b3cac39uc206bb77d9fc78be@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jasonspiro4@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).