From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display-buffer-use-some-window to honor reusable-frames Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:58:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <834jsccepb.fsf@gnu.org> <30c3d810-ed96-a9bd-c622-1761a138515c@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2034"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Tom Gillespie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 18:58:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYQW-0000Ps-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:58:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYQF-0004hy-NM; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYQD-0004hq-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYQC-0006GF-DU; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:58:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.at; s=s31663417; t=1675101501; bh=I3n37iYrzSRHNRtBV9IjfoG4W0ldeyFKchrYmi/KREc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=cAxbC2RxIGxGx+l4S5rlFTnNy9mBrR0ptB+wRVeP2ggkwvNFWHRiBwjdPRiy1GIhU 3jWIbIL/WUfWSTRmesF8DXUMoPw37mgmRjj4Y4zcHLJ3umWOJhy+f0e97jF0kfEECi b5fHROcbz1X529lUyl9P1PA092VQNEChee+7R+15gr0yzkZeRigORt7dU3ViNmRO4V lE4uwmLLheAel1Xg6ohLCwaDFbld9fx9Q3F+6/BXcqfTFpSR6ZzoCkjEwvS6BJYoBe vBxDZJcE7MU2Mlj4AfQc1xhOoCv/9Nv3+9iGgf13NA3KD8ggdlhCjCk14+5VMnkpi8 fVKuqy2YgwYXw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.142.96.159]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MV63q-1pFVPv2qdq-00S33z; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:58:21 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MJZ1arvU0gbVi8cw7sxeZXx2WNxxo60jJcXzAVYm5UT28STv+wC FZvkPrIBllJOGf+iSOemApU2bHjDEedIaeMttwFT7kft2VNPhKanUerF629ck2nlV3/MX+w 0sbT44/34aru4zcqa3FXTt8TiXn6wIDzHoMw+xqKc6uxO/nHbWXy6g8PUN9I6zDDU2gqNHd 8rB3Pdk8Ft4oPFUD9ZnNQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:TMv+5LU40BI=;dl3TwYCJddD8r0AmSqC0tVhyL9h n50Rzwnq4ziwsy5nXdne66oJvEfpkJwUVPfP7+j+vUBqMt1OoEOppI93lzJ7t37tnmQ7n3WTG cIuvW74Mzrmd8wkDe+heyOYt/ylmC5undwbCcJisSVDoJrgHgoVghx6XH5aSiRKWo1F/R9HeD AnO5yga/tj54O2UuQHSDcp/ecQkP2VVxqIp9ltW+QlBQa3+NcTOe+dhZcu9OtDR5ggCvHeJJu rnySJLME5KQJoDUrKI+EN5PPOk6We4LCaFsYuPD7t1vbfzqa1FbkfWDHaPRJzWXSCGtuI6XBm N/5u777c9FZzOKOz95F0PvxdHpUsJfxQQ+CcODCCWdxWImLEbM5h4VEbE5WO8e0mJ+cINMzqT V7mlbawDAOVw065JKEDqmkLWzKprYYwIHmpfHCoXJ3NiQ80uo+l+A0ij0HJIb9Sw/ivKMTFBu zhHvXv+aF81/CSARUokvaxvG2I8xa5LAFOaueUQvmkAkZadcjgCOMMHMFSrst7qw/HAzNv79j NkZmLhKdy2Cvk+LQzSSqY5oRAE9BIiBxvwmlviUvcS8SnVwGi0dJI3aS6nIUJfwRKQzkyY7f3 DlgZ+vYXX0cYlFqWzWDAy9rewNO9aDgCz7wpirmFjMlBKvvdUSnbIQRBWvtVEtI5am4WlHqxQ 80BiwHEc18nAoJ9OuSQ9TO9v3kT0I45OuRH+gBAiT4M/A40Bj4GTOZX0JkwGD62sBE24Z9Jjz ORFdUSlb1t5KJW7YopzBJ1aOjDvFeA9Vw5UmKvRdysMd7ULEnYGUqWJ+drZCoNmfZ/gTr4EQ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=rudalics@gmx.at; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302807 Archived-At: > The main reason not to take that approach is that it > requires changes to display-buffer-use-some-window > like the ones I made in my first patch so that it will > honor reusable-frames (though without the incorrect > call to display-buffer-pop-up-window). Why? Any reusable frame would have been already honored by 'display-buffer-reuse-window'. > It seems > like it will be easier to reason about the impact of > the changes for the patch if we only need to assess > changes to display-buffer-use-least-recent-window. Why would you want to change 'display-buffer-use-some-window'? martin