From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Poll: Change xref-show-definitions-function's default? Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:42:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9af40a30-8964-3142-aadf-6592605720ec@yandex.ru> <87a6trjbat.fsf@gmail.com> <38027208-cc57-d0b9-c530-279b70557327@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27376"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: emacs-devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Mart=c3=adn?= To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 12:44:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwOHO-0006z2-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:44:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwOHN-0005tr-8v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwOGB-0004uF-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]:33732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwOG9-0002Uk-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id n16so7552785wmc.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3+J9hAmIyzls19bqLkJnzHlrx7HYMFsVwhIxIMSX264=; b=nrgLWW93c9CQ7VPP1tqZXqqBin4DU69erQtJzB+KE0z0VP5CU+ggkgs/UP6fnHCaaY vTiGI1JhRe3xQ/pFgorjTp4ehitpyFJ5DU/zZqBayoUIWMU3bbW0BZry5l+Ag0N+rKHz lzyg+uuONjEEEGpI6X0CVQvSVn3j/YqtZzjGywwOct3G9Zu99xt8f0EbSagdIUXiyyjA dyGBqvBz6t5nYZZ5mEF5fO+LnEBAdLde1jsAoGqI1PV81tp9NJxiomui2cu6rr/cV0ak OK/fPj2xQsNGZZCCJR/G3fkteQmQRvB2TiXnTvaOtwB/N8wzvLes7mwls0sDCSUA9p4s rXCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3+J9hAmIyzls19bqLkJnzHlrx7HYMFsVwhIxIMSX264=; b=sqmJAsueyP8oTYJXTJ+G8XffUBaZ2HXwrhELb2FFZYhWkXvyWYqc9PAOZXdG/9NMoc /4puxIPJ/vXufJt7V8RNJiTFzk9pfeRjmrNubIBBV0XL67OuchDcofSVfZheODsAHXIy vDKoQcxkx21MIYTK7Ka4NGci6qLyic6+b2GhBFWu9TXWTsLFG95s58zMzqUZjeGryiw2 BMR0ljZZojVElzz9ftLfu6pGuIqrjcNd3pCOc0qvB4A0HuTOJMsB/YVkHNlihTu/dSys svG2LZHFRjRZb1dXFx2WgkrS2zhCKRxS8HEhvSQcm3f5X4L28geTo0zt31lGDGzxjFw3 cIDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CFtGSiJlXMfOBfG8qSKalbf0E/Y/gZzNFadygUkdCEl2AlZ5c GlQyGQDTqeAu+fnG8uT2lKhAdsYvQ8XDWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDrOnw+yWwNgB/pCY7N/QVDwFvvCxkTN5ZSvZdhWJTEGlevj67XIGSAAbRs6vXTtZF2aytQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6484:: with SMTP id y126mr26363254wmb.76.1609760567660; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm70582898wrh.88.2021.01.04.03.42.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:42:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32d; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262417 Archived-At: On 04.01.2021 13:24, João Távora wrote: > I don't feel as strongly about the transient buffer as I do > about the completing-read option. It doesn't have the same > clear disadvantages to me. But I'm more used to the current > default and I like it. I'll try the transient option for a while. Thank you.