From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:21 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87od75kt78.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87d4nk8y3q.fsf@everybody.org> <87r6bvs3jj.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87mymjs2qw.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <20080522041745.GA29437@tomas> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211430848 11798 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2008 04:34:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 04:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Patrick Drechsler , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 06:34:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jz2Vj-0005U0-IY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 06:34:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59591 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jz2Uy-00023C-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jz2Uq-00021b-Rj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jz2Uo-0001zl-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37491 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jz2Un-0001zW-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44611) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jz2Um-0002CD-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:48949 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jz2TT-00034Y-DT for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jz2Uk-0002B8-6V for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:47672) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jz2UX-00028Q-4S; Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m4M4XF88015865; Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:22 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:22 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:22 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id F389D54C; Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:21 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <20080522041745.GA29437@tomas> (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Thu, 22 May 2008 06:17:45 +0200") Original-Lines: 16 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97499 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22408 Archived-At: tomas@tuxteam.de writes: >> > | [...] XML processors MUST be able to use this character to >> > | differentiate between UTF-8 and UTF-16 encoded documents. >> > `---- > > ...and how are the XML processors supposed to achieve that? Is there a > second variant of BOM, indicating UTF-8? The encoding of BOM (incidentally, isn't this name for it obsolete?) is different in utf-8 and utf-16. -Miles -- Quotation, n. The act of repeating erroneously the words of another. The words erroneously repeated.