From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] XPM in gamegrid.el Date: 09 Jul 2002 12:36:22 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207021946.g62Jkd802100@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207041824.g64IO3906414@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207041910.g64JApB31201@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200207052205.g65M5Qp08476@aztec.santafe.edu> <873cuxu513.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <200207062331.g66NVo010527@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207090144.g691i1K13374@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026185792 19259 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 03:36:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, epameinondas@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rlnk-00050W-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:36:32 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rlvz-0007eP-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:45:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RloK-0005TY-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.214]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rlnv-0005Sp-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g693aSR01710; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:28 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g693aSo21129; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:28 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.30.114.133]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id g693aR415138; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:27 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.10.2+Sun/3.7Wlsi_mx_6.0) with ESMTP id g693aNK21611; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:23 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 9D6C737D5; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:22 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <200207090144.g691i1K13374@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 22 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5589 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5589 Richard Stallman writes: > > Do we always want this? Should the minibuffer use the face definitions > > of the main buffer? > > The simplest definition is, the buffer that was current when you > issued the command. Hmm, well, see the rest of that same message for reason why I think that's not a good thing. > But I think my Calc examples is somewhat atypical. > > Should that Calc example do something special to copy the face > definitions from the current buffer? That would be an acceptable solution, certainly (I already do a bunch of junk to setup this special calc frame, so it's not a problem to a little more). -Miles -- Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.