From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Word syntax question Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87mygy0ybq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87bpxd29ft.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <8763nl1m41.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224652627 9090 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2008 05:17:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 22 07:18:08 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KsW6h-0007gB-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:18:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsW5b-0006mX-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsW5U-0006mK-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsW5T-0006lw-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60665 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsW5S-0006ls-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:54334) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KsW5Q-0004hZ-JS; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:16:49 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m9M5G6MM000955; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:42 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:35 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:35 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id DF7674D; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:34 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:29:21 +0200") Original-Lines: 19 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104821 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> But a global setting seems far too course, and in general, whether it's >> "right" or not seems like it depends more on the precise mixture of >> scripts rather than a user's personal preferences. > > Not global, buffer-specific. Whether stopping or not on script > boundaries depends on the specific mix of scripts in the buffer. > > In addition, perhaps each word-move command should have a way of > overriding that. No, I mean a setting which is only "yea or nay" is too coarse (as opposed to one that targets specific cases). -Miles -- Pray, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.