From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merging pmail Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:41:10 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87y6x4ue2u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <3lsknbtdk9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <77vds7yumx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232678490 7172 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2009 02:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 03:42:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQC0I-0005Qc-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:42:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56137 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQBz0-0004WQ-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQByw-0004WA-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQByv-0004Vv-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35015 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQByv-0004Vs-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:58383) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQByr-000426-TP; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:41:14 -0500 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0N2esJL020382; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:41:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:41:10 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.112.123] [10.114.112.123]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:41:10 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id AB6A952E3CE; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:41:10 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <77vds7yumx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:04:54 -0500") Original-Lines: 13 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108127 Archived-At: Right now, there seem to be rmail*.el and pmail*.el files which are the same except for prefix-renaming (pmail -> rmail). Is this a mistake? It seems like a useless state of affairs... why not just remove the pmail*.el files? [and yeah, the arch tags are screwed up because of it -- but it seems like the correct solution to that problem is just to remove pmail*.el] -Miles -- Brain, n. An apparatus with which we think we think.