From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
Subject: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:53:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <buor7of58r7.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (raw)
Recently Emacs' configure script has been changed to check for the
presence of linux `exec shield' functionality, by looking for the file
/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield, and seeing if it as a non-zero value. If
it is present and enabled, and there's no `setarch' program available,
configure will give an error message and abort. The reason for this, as
I understand it, is that emacs cannot dump on such a system unless it
can use the `setarch' program.
However this test seems too strict: On fencepost.gnu.org, exec-shield
is enabled:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
1
and there is no setarch program:
$ type setarch
bash: type: setarch: not found
and so emacs refuses to configure -- but if disable this test by doing:
$ make ac_cv_file__proc_sys_kernel_exec_shield=no
Then Emacs configures and dumps just fine, despite not using `setarch'.
Perhaps a warning (maybe in big letters) rather than a fatal error would
be appropriate.
Oh, BTW:
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.7-1.494.2.2smp (bhcompile@tweety.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)) #1 SMP Tue Aug 3 09:59:49 EDT 2004
A bit odd that fencepost is running a Redhat kernel when it's a Debian
system but whatever... :-)
Thanks,
-Miles
--
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-04 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-04 5:53 Miles Bader [this message]
2004-10-04 15:04 ` `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Jan D.
2004-10-04 21:20 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-04 21:37 ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 20:40 ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 21:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-05 22:11 ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 0:18 ` Stefan
2004-10-06 1:34 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06 7:50 ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 7:56 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06 11:31 ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 7:48 ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 12:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-06 11:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-06 11:38 ` Jan D.
2004-10-07 15:44 ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-07 16:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-07 18:16 ` Jan D.
2004-10-09 1:25 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-11 10:30 ` Jan D.
2004-10-12 8:56 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-20 20:33 ` Jan D.
2004-10-21 13:57 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-22 21:02 ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-25 19:05 ` Jan D.
2004-10-26 20:24 ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-27 10:48 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-27 12:17 ` Jan D.
2004-11-06 17:00 ` other unexec problems Camm Maguire
2004-11-09 7:58 ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 18:04 ` `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=buor7of58r7.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp \
--to=miles@lsi.nec.co.jp \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).