From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:34:11 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200410052211.i95MBJxm023321@coolsville.localdomain> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097026508 31654 80.91.229.6 (6 Oct 2004 01:35:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 01:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Jan D." , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 06 03:35:02 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CF0hp-00017X-00 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:35:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CF0oV-0000yq-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CF0oO-0000yf-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CF0oN-0000yN-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CF0oN-0000yD-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.32.8.214] (helo=tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CF0hW-000070-JO; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate99.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.186]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id i961YLA21435; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:21 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id i961YKA02333; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:20 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg04.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.17.201]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id i961YHx15538; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:17 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg04.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i961YDis024539; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:15 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id i961YBwt006617; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id A181725; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:34:11 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Stefan System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Stefan's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:18:18 -0400") Original-Lines: 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27967 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27967 Stefan writes: > I.e. just transform the current error into a warning. I'd suggest this as the short-term fix. It can use appropriately big letters or whitespace or whatever, to be noticeable. -Miles -- Freedom's just another word, for nothing left to lose --Janis Joplin