From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: newsticker-*.el files Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:23:02 +0900 Message-ID: References: <200806082201.m58M142d000380@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212999908 24809 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2008 08:25:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 09 10:25:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5ch5-0002r1-Qm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:25:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5cgI-00089W-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5cet-0007cg-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5cer-0007cH-HU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:23:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57679 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5cer-0007cC-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:49622) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5cej-00087X-CN; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m598N3B5026463; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:23:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:23:03 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:23:03 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id ED86E468; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:23:02 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:16:14 +0300") Original-Lines: 14 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98778 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Not that I see how this is relevant: all I'm asking is not break it > more than it is already broken, so that the efforts to revive it won't > be harder than they have to. The cost of this request is so low that > I'm bewildered why I need to justify it each time. I think the perception is that the benefit is less than the cost, even if the latter is "low". -Miles -- Education, n. That which discloses to the wise and disguises from the foolish their lack of understanding.