From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ./make-dist for unicode branch Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:56:52 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87bqyasvv6.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <877j8yse2a.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <873bjmryr5.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <87vewgca2p.fsf@emfox.3322.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137740363 19137 80.91.229.2 (20 Jan 2006 06:59:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: EmfoxZhou@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 20 07:59:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzqEw-0006CT-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:59:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzqHN-0008Fp-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EzqFL-0008Eo-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:59:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EzqFJ-0008Dw-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzqFI-0008Dh-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.82] (helo=mgate02.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EzqJM-0002Dt-0B; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com (relay31 [10.29.19.54]) by mgate02.necel.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0K4omm9026456; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:56:52 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:56:52 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:56:52 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 38E844BC; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:56:52 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Kenichi Handa System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:30:33 +0900") Original-Lines: 19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49308 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: >> If they're automatically generated, they shouldn't be in CVS... > > I basically agree with that. But, then, how can we make > them included in a tarball generated by Emfox's way? I admit, I have no idea what the intended purpose of "--snapshot" is, but for the normal case (no --snapshot), make-dist contains logic to build any files that need to be generated (.elc files, info files, etc), by calling "make" or invoking emacs or whatever. It seems that this data should be handled in the same way. Since --snapshot results in "--no-update --no-check" it would seem to be imply that it's up to the user to make sure their tree is in a sane state. -Miles -- We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. -Oscar Wilde