From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with info (emacs version) Date: 03 Jun 2003 15:46:36 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200306020333.h523XMC23468@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200306030522.h535MWh24584@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054622784 19568 80.91.224.249 (3 Jun 2003 06:46:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 06:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 03 08:46:19 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19N5Yp-00054y-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:46:19 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19N5po-0001KP-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 09:03:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19N5ar-0006q2-Tw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 02:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19N5aL-00067x-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 02:47:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19N5Zm-0004H8-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 02:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.214]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19N5ZP-0003fz-8w; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 02:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195])h536kew12079; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:40 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv3.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id h536kd505898; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:39 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg03.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.203]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.6p2/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id h536kcm19360; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:38 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id PAA24881; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:37 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) with ESMTP id h536kaNH016835; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:37 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id DB5BD3702; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:36 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 16 Original-cc: rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14620 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14620 Simon Josefsson writes: > > What's wrong with just adding `invisible' to the default list of > > properties stripped by yanking? > > Could work. But if, say, message uses the invisible property > internally to keep some hidden data around in the buffer, cut'n'paste > within the message buffer can generate unexpected result. Well, does it? Unless there are real concrete cases where stripping invisible would be bad, it seems silly to go around making kludgey solutions when such an obvious (and easy) one is staring right at you... -Miles -- I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff