From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:59:46 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87sjx6zczl.fsf@member.fsf.org> <30611405.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294376406 25456 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2011 05:00:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 05:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jashy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 07 06:00:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb4Qk-0002zq-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 06:00:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pb4Qj-0002D1-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53799 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pb4Qd-0002BE-Hu for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:59:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb4Qc-0007Ur-La for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:59:55 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:59577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb4Qa-0007Ud-Ni; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:59:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.184]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p074xmUK014512; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id p074xmJ06476; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by vgate01.nec.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p074vxDu006480; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.117] [10.29.19.117]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:48 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.97.191] [10.114.97.191]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:47 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 704B552E222; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:59:47 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <30611405.post@talk.nabble.com> (Jashy's message of "Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:17:59 -0800 (PST)") Original-Lines: 15 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134344 Archived-At: Jashy writes: >> I just noticed that my emacs uses up more than a gigabyte memory. It is >> because of doc-view with ImageMagick backend. >> > I met same issue. My impression is that in general, ImageMagick does not aim at memory efficiency (that's why I don't want to use its libraries for my own image I/O needs, event though doing so would be pretty convenient). I would have though it's OK for small/medium images though. -Miles -- Run away! Run away!