From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs lisp syntax rfc: (cond (EXPR => (lambda (X) ...))) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:17:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <877hengesr.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294204672 5631 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2011 05:17:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 05:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 05 06:17:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaLkp-0007iz-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 06:17:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaLko-0000Hn-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34880 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaLkg-0000Fo-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaLkf-0006jn-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:17:38 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:34885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaLke-0006jY-Qw; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:17:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p055HZVu003700; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id p055HZ405399; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54]) by vgate02.nec.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p055A6OQ001834; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay41.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.117] [10.29.19.117]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:35 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.98.36] [10.114.98.36]) by relay41.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:34 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id B961E52E21E; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:17:34 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <877hengesr.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:45:56 +0100") Original-Lines: 11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134275 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > In Scheme, the expression: > (cond (EXPR => (lambda (X) ...))) Syntax is horrible. -miles -- Friendless, adj. Having no favors to bestow. Destitute of fortune. Addicted to utterance of truth and common sense.