From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87u0ebg4cb.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132228717 17789 80.91.229.2 (17 Nov 2005 11:58:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , snogglethorpe@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 12:58:26 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EciMM-0005ex-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EciMM-00010J-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:55:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EcgwG-00035r-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EcgrJ-0002hy-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcgaP-00029y-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.81] (helo=mgate01.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EcgaO-0006T2-GZ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:01:45 -0500 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com (relay21 [10.29.19.50]) by mgate01.necel.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAH7TiVM004074; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.96.23] [10.114.96.23]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 49CB23B5; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Sascha Wilde System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Sascha Wilde's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:51:19 +0100") Original-Lines: 18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46153 Archived-At: Sascha Wilde writes: > agree with Juri, that the slightly different behavior of M-# is > extremely inconvenient. IMO this should be fixed, by making M-# > advance to (like M-u does!). Sounds fine to me. > BUT, in general I think, that Emacs as a whole should be as consistent > as possible. Sure, consistency, in general, is good. But absolute consistency is not necessary; sometimes it's more important to retain historical bindings, or to favor local consistency over global consistency. -miles -- o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.