From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending attachments Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:47:11 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k52rzyn1.fsf@benthic.rattlesnake.com> <873a9fw6dt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6r7yp1y.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ljn1dcc4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A5485D0.5060808@gnu.org> <87d48b9trl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <871vor45w8.fsf@iki.fi> <87y6qz8d1y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A54B693.6080905@gnu.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247107658 23228 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2009 02:47:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 09 04:47:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MOjfX-0006L6-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:47:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOjfW-0001ku-B8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MOjfQ-0001jX-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MOjfL-0001fL-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34820 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOjfL-0001fI-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:33154) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MOjfI-00038B-0L; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n692lCiN025739; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:47:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:47:12 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.114.32] [10.114.114.32]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:47:12 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 9712052E1A7; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:47:12 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <4A54B693.6080905@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:09:07 +0800") Original-Lines: 20 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112219 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > It seems you only read the last bit of what I wrote. Whatever.... If people want to waste their time duplicating code and making Emacs harder to use and understand for silly reasons, it's their business, but I'm not going spend any more effort on it. So, I'm going to plonk this thread. If at some point real issues start to be addressed (for instance, actually figuring out a coherent plan for making mail/news sending in Emacs better for everybody, not just rms and ams), could someone give me a ping, so I can start paying attention again? Thanks, -Miles -- My spirit felt washed. With blood. [Eli Shin, on "The Passion of the Christ"]