* umask and permissions of installed files
@ 2009-09-03 1:07 Glenn Morris
2009-09-03 2:42 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2009-09-03 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
In connection with addressing bug#3800 I would like to ask: what is
the right thing to do wrt the installing user's umask when installing?
The two reasonable options would seem to be
i) ignore it, and make the install world-readable, with the exception
that pre-existing "common" directories should not have their
permissions altered, as requested in bug#3800. Ideally, the install
whould warn about any non-standard permissions.
ii) respect it, and don't mess with the permissions of the install at all
Option i) seems like the right thing to me.
At the moment, there is an inconsistent mish-mash of i) and ii).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: umask and permissions of installed files
2009-09-03 1:07 umask and permissions of installed files Glenn Morris
@ 2009-09-03 2:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-03 3:16 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-03 7:44 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2009-09-03 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel
> In connection with addressing bug#3800 I would like to ask: what is
> the right thing to do wrt the installing user's umask when installing?
> The two reasonable options would seem to be
> i) ignore it, and make the install world-readable, with the exception
> that pre-existing "common" directories should not have their
> permissions altered, as requested in bug#3800. Ideally, the install
> whould warn about any non-standard permissions.
> ii) respect it, and don't mess with the permissions of the install at all
> Option i) seems like the right thing to me.
> At the moment, there is an inconsistent mish-mash of i) and ii).
What's the "standard procedure"?
Obviously, Emacs is not the first package to face this question.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: umask and permissions of installed files
2009-09-03 2:42 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2009-09-03 3:16 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-03 7:44 ` Andreas Schwab
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2009-09-03 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> What's the "standard procedure"?
> Obviously, Emacs is not the first package to face this question.
I found the question repeated a few times, but haven't found a clear answer:
curl:
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/tracker-2008-01/0077.html
automake:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2003-05/msg00004.html
install.sh seems to set directories to 755.
Maybe someone here can tell us...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: umask and permissions of installed files
2009-09-03 2:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-03 3:16 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2009-09-03 7:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-09-03 7:54 ` Miles Bader
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2009-09-03 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> In connection with addressing bug#3800 I would like to ask: what is
>> the right thing to do wrt the installing user's umask when installing?
>
>> The two reasonable options would seem to be
>
>> i) ignore it, and make the install world-readable, with the exception
>> that pre-existing "common" directories should not have their
>> permissions altered, as requested in bug#3800. Ideally, the install
>> whould warn about any non-standard permissions.
>
>> ii) respect it, and don't mess with the permissions of the install at all
>
>> Option i) seems like the right thing to me.
>
>> At the moment, there is an inconsistent mish-mash of i) and ii).
>
> What's the "standard procedure"?
The "standard procedure" is to use install which ignores umask.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-03 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-03 1:07 umask and permissions of installed files Glenn Morris
2009-09-03 2:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-03 3:16 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-03 7:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-09-03 7:54 ` Miles Bader
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).