From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Breakpoint ignored. Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900 Message-ID: References: <877hutz9zb.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbtxgwqz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255933372 6490 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2009 06:22:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 08:22:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mzldd-00046D-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:22:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mzldc-0003K8-IB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:22:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzldW-0003K2-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzldR-0003JS-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49525 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzldQ-0003JP-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:49600) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MzldM-0002Ew-Nz; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n9J6MEj7016666; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.114.39] [10.114.114.39]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 9D26652E1F8; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:17 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:18:14 -0400") Original-Lines: 20 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116242 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> You are probably missing the fact that Emacs tries to optimize the >> case of insertion of a single character. > >> or add a variable to control it and turn on the variable >> only on the slower computers. > > I've removed the optimization here, and can't tell the difference even > on my 400MHz cell phone. Tho I imagine it's hard to type very quickly on a cell phone! (at least compared to the speed of typing with a real keyboard) -Miles -- Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle. "That's some catch, that Catch-22," he observed. "It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.