From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gud lord! Date: 12 Jun 2003 10:43:00 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <16098.1698.415992.223606@nick.uklinux.net> <1055004206.1439.12.camel@lan1> <20030607210527.GA20914@gnu.org> <200306072235.h57MZcUn014593@rum.cs.yale.edu> <87fzmgenxe.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200306111432.h5BEWblQ004833@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1055382147 16068 80.91.224.249 (12 Jun 2003 01:42:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 12 03:42:25 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19QH6f-0004Av-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 03:42:25 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19QHRu-000496-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 04:04:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19QH7p-0000WX-7K for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19QH7V-0000SJ-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19QH7U-0000Os-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.214]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19QH7S-0000FK-Ey; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.194])h5C1h3w01263; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv4.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.196]) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id h5C1h3w23809; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg04.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.17.201]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id h5C1h2314862; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:02 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id KAA20284; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:02 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) with ESMTP id h5C1h0NH015359; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:00 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 0A35236FF; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:43:00 +0900 (JST) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <200306111432.h5BEWblQ004833@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 22 Original-cc: Robert Anderson Original-cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15050 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15050 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > I looked for Emacs support on the Arch Wiki but couldn't find any > discussion of it: neither yours nor Landry's. > Can't someone add links for them (I still have no idea where to > find those two beasts) ? The arch Wiki is pretty badly organized (well, it's a Wiki after all!), but I found an emacs mode in the web-browsable ArX source tree: http://superbeast.ucsd.edu/~landry/ArX/ArX-1.0pre8/tools/emacs/ It looks slightly odd in that it consists of about a zillion files, each containing a single elisp function, and it appears to be a standalone minor mode rather than a vc.el backend (I wonder, is this because arch can't be fit into the vc.el model, or because the author simply didn't make the effort?). -Miles -- `...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]