From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Return Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:47:08 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87mxojwu15.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4jnweng.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291697248 21713 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2010 04:47:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , MON KEY , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 07 05:47:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPpSV-0002hE-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:47:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34529 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPpSU-00046C-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:47:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45951 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPpSM-000432-DF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:47:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPpSK-0007F4-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:44368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPpSK-0007EX-8k; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oB74l9eF010325; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:09 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id oB74l9R28153; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:09 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay61.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.64]) by vgate01.nec.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB74l2ks000617; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:08 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.40] [10.29.19.40]) by relay61.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:08 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.98.217] [10.114.98.217]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:08 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 7B1DE52E22A; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:47:08 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:09:34 -0500") Original-Lines: 13 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133484 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Actually, I'm considering to disallow non-top-level defuns in > lexical-scope mode, just because it's a good opportunity to introduce > such "breakage" and because non-top-level defuns are bugs in 99% of > the cases (in Elisp). I presume by "non-top-level defun" you mean "defun inside a function", not "defun inside a form"... -Miles -- 97% of everything is grunge