From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing the no-toolkit scrollbar thumb color. (minor issue) Date: 06 Oct 2003 11:22:05 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87fzijz4th.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <200309262123.h8QLNNi07638@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200309272155.h8RLttv09524@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200309281642.h8SGgxc11119@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200309281801.h8SI1gV11332@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200309300011.h8U0B6021222@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3F7F1343.2020208@swipnet.se> <200310051756.h95Hunq22538@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065407187 6207 80.91.224.253 (6 Oct 2003 02:26:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 02:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 06 04:26:25 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6L4r-0006RC-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 04:26:25 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6L4o-0004PJ-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 04:26:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6L2g-00035Y-Ok for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 22:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A6L2a-00031J-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 22:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A6L23-0002fY-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 22:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.32.8.214] (helo=TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6L12-0001eu-Kl; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 22:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.194]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id h962MEg26690; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:14 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv3.nec.co.jp (mailgate52.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.191]) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id h962MDf19053; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:13 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edsgm02.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.50.208.12]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id h962MCf23543; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edsgm02.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.9.3p2+3.2W/3.7W_EDC_Ver.1.0) with ESMTP id LAA19288; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id h962M67Q011777; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id EEA7C370D; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:22:05 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <200310051756.h95Hunq22538@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Original-Lines: 23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16954 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16954 Luc Teirlinck writes: > If so, what percentage (very roughly) of themes are pixmap based? Hard to say. A pretty large proportion of the themes you find on `themes.org' (well that's now defunct, but you know) are pixmap based. Basically it's what you use if you want something really pretty and unique; the other theme engines are not that bad, but tend to generate pretty bland-looking results (e.g., they all basically look sort of like windows with different colors and more rounded edges or something :-). > If say, only the theme actually named "Pixmap", or similar themes > whose name clearly indicates that they are pixmap based, would be > affected, we could just tell users not to use these themes, if they > want full customizability. I don't think there's any easy way to tell. Many users like pixmap themes though, so I think they should be supported where possible (sometimes it's simply not possible [or practical] of course). -Miles -- I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff