From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EMACS_INT cleanup Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:12 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83aan8uvy3.fsf@gnu.org> <8339t0uthi.fsf@gnu.org> <831v8kurwd.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrqctcha.fsf@gnu.org> <83vd5wtc7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5gjtwf6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285321420 25318 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2010 09:43:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 11:43:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz4oX-0001aa-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:43:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oz4oX-0004MU-86 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46794 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oz4oM-0004LN-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz4oL-00068G-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:42723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz4oJ-00067d-C0; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.184]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o8O9hGhp019835; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id o8O9hGX11084; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay41.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.9]) by vgate02.nec.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8O9cdfP010747; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay61.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.117] [10.29.19.117]) by relay41.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.96.59] [10.114.96.59]) by relay61.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:16 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id E534F124009; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:43:14 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <83r5gjtwf6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:47:41 +0200") Original-Lines: 15 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130741 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I mean, it may be nice and orthogonal and stuff, but... I don't know. >> And does using more longs on 64-bit machines than previously slow Emacs >> down any? > > It shouldn't, the registers are 64-bit. Means more cache usage and memory traffic tho. Whether it's enough to matter, I dunno. -Miles -- You can hack anything you want, with TECO and DDT.