From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: makeinfo-info.el - use Info-mode with makeinfo-buffer Date: 02 Dec 2002 15:08:44 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038809517 14116 80.91.224.249 (2 Dec 2002 06:11:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 06:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Thien-Thi Nguyen , Kevin Ryde , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18IjoB-0003fY-00 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 07:11:55 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18Ijx3-0001hQ-00 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 07:21:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18IjmN-00005t-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Ijlo-000894-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Ijll-00088D-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.51]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Ijlk-00085q-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id gB268ui13374; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:08:56 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv4.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id gB268tq13953; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:08:55 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.30.114.133]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id gB268s207708; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:08:54 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.10.2+Sun/3.7Wlsi_mx_6.0) with ESMTP id gB268mB13764; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:08:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 0F6CE370E; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:08:44 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 14 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9784 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9784 Eli Zaretskii writes: > > some diff programs support -w and -b to ignore whitespace changes. > > Yes, but then Patch could choke on such a diff. So please don't. It depends on whether the patch is intended for applying or for explanation. I think in this case it was just intended to show the proposed changes. Perhaps the safest thing is to send both patches -- e.g. the `-wb' patch first for humans to read, and then the real patch as an attachment or something... -Miles -- Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)