From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: compilation-forget-errors still used by tex-mode.el Date: 02 Apr 2004 11:01:33 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040331135707.514e5cbe.occitan@esperanto.org> <877jwzwu6t.fsf-monnier+emacs@iro.umontreal.ca> <20040401203403.3042d9d8.occitan@esperanto.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080871916 27259 80.91.224.253 (2 Apr 2004 02:11:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 02:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Pfeiffer , emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier , Markus Rost Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 04:11:46 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9E9q-00035z-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:11:46 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9E9p-0008Nf-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:11:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9E8s-0003TT-UZ for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B9E7o-0003In-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B9E7F-0002ti-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:09:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [210.143.35.52] (helo=TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9E7E-0002tW-GZ; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160] (may be forged)) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id i3221eh24469; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:02:04 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id i3221eG27989; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:01:40 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg03.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.203]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id i3221dX17075; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:01:39 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg03.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3221Zup003365; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:01:36 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15 (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id i3221YnX024285; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:01:34 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id E45F43B7; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:01:33 +0900 (JST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21181 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21181 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > You should definitely make a separate variable for compile, as the > "standard" arrow is reserved for gdb. I can easily envision running > compile and gdb simultaneously. Yeah, but I thought the arrow in question was in the *compilation* buffer; why would gdb want a pointer in there?!? -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen