From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:22:32 +0900 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145326975 21083 80.91.229.2 (18 Apr 2006 02:22:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 18 04:22:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVfrf-0005Oa-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:22:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVfre-0000xs-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:22:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FVfrT-0000wQ-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FVfrR-0000uW-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVfrR-0000uT-Lu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.82] (helo=mgate02.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FVfsB-0003i4-2i; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:23:23 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com (relay11 [10.29.19.46]) by mgate02.necel.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3I17Dn7007594; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:22:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:22:33 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:22:32 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id B2298592; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:22:32 +0900 (JST) Original-To: "Herbert Euler" System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Herbert Euler's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:18:58 +0800") Original-Lines: 15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52994 Archived-At: "Herbert Euler" writes: >> But if so I think the name 'max-specpdl-size' should be altered, since >> normally a maximum value needs explicitly change, i.e. there should be >> a particular function to change a maximum value. >> >>What would you think of specpdl-size-limit as a name for this? > > Yes it's better, since this name (in my opinion) is not confused. They sound exactly the same to me... -Miles -- A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and said, "Make me one with everything."