From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 88578a4: Increase the default number of hits Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87wps1ghyu.fsf@gnus.org> <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871ta9ar7a.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451178057 26449 80.91.229.3 (27 Dec 2015 01:00:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 27 02:00:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhg-0004WY-Bt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:00:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhf-0001Xe-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhT-0001XX-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhS-00068G-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhI-00067i-DH; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aCzhH-0000FE-La; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:00:31 -0500 X-Spook: Interstate dictionary Weapons grade E. Coli Saddam X-Ran: s`3rzt*b_Di`s:\pU.nOTNm}4Xl!ga08.0c{`/T{-' (Michael Albinus's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:30:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196944 Archived-At: Michael Albinus wrote: > Glenn Morris writes: > >> In fact, there really should be a hard limit that the server imposes. >> (Michael, could you look at implementing that?) > > Will check. What would be an acceptable hard limit? 5.000? Personally I'd want to see the hard limit set at 1000. 5000 is just too much. It may seem to work ok for one person, but then if two of you happen to do that at the same time, bang. (I just run debbugs-gnu and watch memory usage in top.) If you want to implement clever ways to run separate queries one after the other then stitch the results together via local caching, I guess that's ok.