From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Redisplay problems? Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <> < <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org>> < <834n2q43os.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83vbv62gr7.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83txao1c8n.fsf@gnu.org>> < <83k3bj1otm.fsf@gnu.org>> < <838urz1jjg.fsf@gnu.org>> < <834n2n0wbe.fsf@gnu.org>> <> <<83d2h9yo5m.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395848280 20799 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2014 15:38:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 26 16:38:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSpu3-0002vJ-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:38:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSpu3-0004N0-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSptj-0003yn-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSptb-0007zT-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:42445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSptS-0007uv-3L; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s2QFbIhR032487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:37:19 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2QFbHQO026511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:37:18 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2QFbGja027135; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:37:16 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83d2h9yo5m.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171007 Archived-At: Dunno whether this is pertinent to this thread. If not, ignore. It just happened for me that (a) I was in an Emacs (recent build) buffer/frame and then (b) I clicked a non-Emacs window mgr window. (Neither the Emacs frame nor the other window-mgr window obscured the other. They were just next to each other on the screen, without overlapping.) The Emacs frame display immediately turned blank - lost *all* display of the text etc. I clicked back in the Emacs frame - still nothing displayed. I hit `C-l', and only a little bit of the text was then displayed. This didn't happen previously, AFAIK. (I naively get the impression that someone has being trying too hard to skip some redisplaying, in an attempt to optimize things. Too clever by half, perhaps?) Again, if not helpful at all, please ignore.