unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Docstrings and manuals
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 23:22:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbfc4ed6-21c3-dc0c-ab38-623c8bfebb6c@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83twj09pc5.fsf@gnu.org>

On 04/17/2016 07:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> To produce a good manual text, you need to try to describe and explain
> the subject in some logical way.  The result is not a derivative, in
> that it doesn't necessarily repeat the doc strings and then adds some
> more stuff (although doing that is sometimes TRT).

It should be a derivative in the sense that it's produced based on 
knowing the docstrings and the common context they're used it. But not 
some additional inner details about each symbol that never made it into 
docstrings, I think.

> It could be that
> most of the text of the manual section has no direct relation at all
> to the doc strings.  It could even be an entirely different POV of
> looking at the subject.  E.g., compare the node "Generic Functions" in
> the ELisp manual with the doc strings of the symbols covered by that
> node.  As an even more extreme example, compare the node
> "Bidirectional Editing" in the user manual with the doc strings of the
> 3 variables it covers.

Bidirectional Editing is fine. It describes a facility that's largely 
implemented in C, so the three variables are just a small part of it.

Generic Functions, on the other hand, may be indicative of the problem 
that I've brought up: the descriptions of `cl-defgeneric' and 
`cl-defmethod' and much longer in the manual than their docstrings 
(especially the latter one). I see no particular reason for them to be 
different in this case.

Maybe that will require restructuring the manual text to move the 
enumeration of the possible types (defined in cl--generic-typeof-types) 
to a separate paragraph or section, but that seems only beneficial.

Why would we want to mention that :before methods get called "in the 
most-specific-first order" only in the manual, but not in the docstring? 
And so on.

When a docstring gets too complicated, we can go the way of `cl-loop' 
to, again, avoid repeating ourselves. In that case I at least know to 
consult the manual, and which node to visit.



  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-17 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru>
     [not found]   ` <87oa9dzgl0.fsf@gmx.de>
     [not found]     ` <bbdc2630-f791-dace-15d0-c1e73d8c88fc@yandex.ru>
     [not found]       ` <87potshczh.fsf@gmx.de>
     [not found]         ` <e3132bc6-f1d4-ebef-00d4-93fa0807fea0@yandex.ru>
     [not found]           ` <87h9f4ghzg.fsf@gmx.de>
     [not found]             ` <ec924912-8098-c824-0583-bed1e7150074@yandex.ru>
     [not found]               ` <8737qnc8ep.fsf@gmx.de>
2016-04-17  0:17                 ` Docstrings and manuals, was: Re: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17  8:49                   ` Docstrings and manuals Michael Albinus
2016-04-17 10:50                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17 11:16                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-17 11:42                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17 12:19                           ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-17 13:12                             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17 15:14                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-17 16:39                               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-17 19:39                                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17 15:12                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-17 19:59                             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18  2:30                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-18 12:55                             ` Phillip Lord
2016-04-18 15:35                               ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-04-18 15:47                               ` Stefan Monnier
2016-04-18 16:30                                 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-04-18 18:56                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-18 19:33                                   ` Stefan Monnier
2016-04-18 19:39                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]                           ` <<83ziss9sml.fsf@gnu.org>
2016-04-17 15:54                             ` Drew Adams
2016-04-17 15:03                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-17 15:15                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-17 16:23                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-17 20:22                             ` Dmitry Gutov [this message]
2016-04-18  2:33                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-18  8:38                           ` Richard Stallman
2016-04-18  9:50                             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-19  0:25                               ` Richard Stallman
2016-04-19  7:59                                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-19 23:51                                   ` Richard Stallman
2016-04-18 14:55           ` vc-state and unregistered (was: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision) Michael Albinus
2016-04-18 21:11             ` vc-state and unregistered Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-19  8:10               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-19  8:21                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-19  8:31                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-19  8:43                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 12:11                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 12:21                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 12:45                           ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 12:49                             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 13:07                               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 13:13                                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 13:24                                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 13:27                                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 14:03                                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 17:23                                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 17:35                                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 18:13                                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 18:58                                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 19:41                                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-24 20:43                                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-24 13:08                               ` Dmitry Gutov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bbfc4ed6-21c3-dc0c-ab38-623c8bfebb6c@yandex.ru \
    --to=dgutov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
    --cc=rgm@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).