From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master fe939b3 1/2: Fix reference to `tags-loop-continue' in doc string Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 13:42:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20190801195403.16246.49802@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190801195406.087AF20CC8@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87ef23allc.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <877e7vpgmt.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="152442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 05 12:42:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1huaS9-000dVY-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:42:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huaS7-0007EA-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:42:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huaRq-0007E2-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:42:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huaRp-00018W-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]:33901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huaRp-00017m-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id b29so50305891lfq.1 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 03:42:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LbVyWa1Jc0qR3i9JiD8tTMR9YotjNlWXqnb7SuPh9qI=; b=DZIFdh+vJjrywBMJnpwFE2oV22jEvw87cqoZMeiwLo9TOWBhY2K0Q8TUkNdi5QSjDV EyO6JSxL+5b/smEO8R0aez49djLJlH0FO/uZeDsOeu3XNHoTIDI013bIA89pwjCFQGVj dUZLyyHPRmLyn4p0TjlvqUtyKTj3mfcqdBGkS/ZyvHuodVUCb22qqFwlhB5QkkauoRQO yPOiZFxtT4GL7Jcl7ydrVq7TgVkZ2m0bmoy+4CnYe3LessRo4NGP8oZe5J/l+zlIPhxH L64x8iacO4hIUiw0vaushjvn+2LOiAeyue2rzH8tdvKg2y7CfmJsfa7Loz+/t1y3QFsM rJNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LbVyWa1Jc0qR3i9JiD8tTMR9YotjNlWXqnb7SuPh9qI=; b=NxkudGSdc6T1O3iw2fUYEG74rcenZBNP7h1ooHPeg9HGjkt5VPsWEGgRDeoeLLLs1U XS8ieNpkY1q9i/9HhOablXpWIoSuCno1nftPrctTN98S08fSQQ9KEFFF4ErCq7DGii5f LhrS2oyPdimcwNsUuMJCegNjbp5l8eq/HL6XZMKd+r03/b1UKq6iOY64o7v4AFqZvCOA eLgzgdpoUGD97tFQmxQfVJCTxK6lttLc6lHRhb+nDg2QnMspvhUwQ/6EEZrKh51CI7Dx PZvpjlJqJXXSY16EulgHBZm4cbrPgQ3cjCsZk05y62E2P4anAF6kYFlK8ej45ZaDENTH uX0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4Qcx1RHojOve6LMquos3kLvf/ghGZjHdRAMQL//rIKdE8Ve/b AZLpyvzYnNnI+qnPXufZ86B8Uz1VaDq8GQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWpPdjQ22SVyHsEd5D1zqOa9oEmcPtjl7YHKqoJlaX2j0Xe6x/sBFnPjbCH32k2KTy5ODUaA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46f8:: with SMTP id q24mr3824420lfo.89.1565001755808; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b21sm668177lff.11.2019.08.05.03.42.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Aug 2019 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::12a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239175 Archived-At: On 8/4/19 3:03 PM, Robert Pluim wrote: > It begs the question why xrefs replaced a 'do the next thing' type > binding with a 'go back' type binding in the first place. Because it's more useful. The xref UI presents you with all matches right away, and you choose before visiting, so you don't really need the "go next" binding 98% of the time. There's also 'next-error', which navigates between the matches too. > Iʼm tempted > to say that xref-pop-marker-stack should use a different binding, and > M-, should be fileloop-continue, but the xref one has existed for 5 > years now. Exactly. That ship has sailed. If you are still not convinced, please go ahead and look up the older discussions for our reasoning.