From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 23:57:28 +0300 Message-ID: References: <875ygb401m.fsf@rfc20.org> <838rl5qtag.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30496"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Matt Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 22:58:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1onR0k-0007k0-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 22:58:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onQzm-0006r8-Uu; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onQzi-0006gs-Rf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onQzf-0002Aw-1f; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:57:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id bk15so23141530wrb.13; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:57:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rbWOTlaEDI99NkYRb4KIMH7RfKce67loYMi8CLcgTK8=; b=g9I61nvWR/C/gbvgDbEEIZuRnbcubMFg/qDIlKz9XJhpFhTZrMnDhfWG/yqm1m1d2+ fYz3ddIqBXSoCUXlt5ptRVJeBKjDlkM3wFJ1Lofk+DT4M06kC1D0VYOEc18Y+dJUqGy7 3KQD0H+9TYmXHrwkKy3YXssJg85YaKgupmHDlSARRG0jDPdlHpPVg/ApyiP206P6QeiL FBNZs5qsPdXgEbNCon3uwSEQt22PEycdXfhKdtvxz9OpyjpNWINCa0FfgTIYzfRPWxoc XNI3fzOBHVaNC0K84g56EET1trFVtrCfZFFycVJZNySpCrZ5aRfyfa1GTZc8ZQR5WGqi WBmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rbWOTlaEDI99NkYRb4KIMH7RfKce67loYMi8CLcgTK8=; b=tUULeHUnRE7sRQ9bnTEJVLr9UOUv5NBW8dUkMtY6WbEdlfLHazjslE+PJA2uT2Uig8 Q9b3YKsuAP/dQ/HJ4OdTPnpsNX09WfOxyFq0D4JALrGa7U0lZCbj2dbrvcuvQtzPcZGl MOVtl6FNMLAI4nGxcc6ftd9K1otM4Z7e8Eax8voTym0fSxZ1+Oet2aleqz9qBIrAGq5i Y6Si7o/+udc169WuL8l9GejxUomec0PjoHCbxZiXLyYz2IeOTG9P/2Jr+YPWa3C38GRg gM68fbvfMg56ydxzjndq6hLESUcsXoMc7zGmML99blwDo0rRPS/1SlcQRKR8hoIlUmGq Kkug== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf26XJFYTbMwY0X5F1iDz+FqOwIlNuSMoBOc1m82aaHofu7rEqhT Og0nM99ziLqD2tmDjFE9R1tZegjLBaM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7KgWxHrE3TRCDbndf1x5+uxhKnEzupc4IAMw+62IDfU+bBVfZkUQQpvhsX0nnr7/hEClhBkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64c2:0:b0:22e:41b0:42ca with SMTP id f2-20020a5d64c2000000b0022e41b042camr27079641wri.411.1666731451734; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x23-20020a05600c21d700b003a83ca67f73sm81187wmj.3.2022.10.25.13.57.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <838rl5qtag.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298498 Archived-At: Hi! On 24.10.2022 15:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Matt Armstrong >> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 21:49:09 -0700 >> >> There are two calls to 'overlays_in' in buffer.c that I couldn't cover >> from ELisp: 'disable_line_numbers_overlay_at_eob' and >> 'mouse_face_overlay_overlaps'. They're both display related. >> >> Trying to manually exercise 'disable_line_numbers_overlay_at_eob' I >> couldn't find any ELisp that set `display-line-numbers-disable' on an >> overlay, and only two that do it in a text property (vc/log-edit.el and >> something in helm), so even if there were a bug here I'm not sure anyone >> would discover it. > AFAIR, company-mode uses that overlay property. Dmitry, am I right? Doesn't look like it. I vaguely remember discussing it, but it seems we have solved the corresponding problem some other way.