From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:41:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <43b24209-fa65-0e26-7cbd-f99175a7ffd8@gmx.at> <87wnx7j5is.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83im8qnyca.fsf@gnu.org> <83bleinmse.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 14:42:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kt9qL-0007KL-SE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:42:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt9qK-0003iY-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 08:42:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt9p4-00037f-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 08:41:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt9p2-00008P-Ej; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 08:41:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1608990083; bh=rA5F1px4DYtDyO7RK2tf4woFaaY6i66AurQBIgR94ew=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ReHF58L9TNHT9AxPExy9tGeDYev55MqYtyTcwV4z1XbOBjNBZsJcAOQ4MGk1E+U2A gZaj1sJUBA67KY+pzIY5Qcu8FzFeulJFt8j1MiU9b9OiIkpB+caeCYvGLfqmRNkM3P GJFOEHNQY+DIenswgIxZIiRi8dW18Nvf3MTa2Wwg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.164]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRCOK-1keuEI3Lfg-00NAi2; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:41:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:smCoVqfYefEXJdd0jMxGcWQZIc10/fPVZUpbzxaeXpBwqjEHuYk vwcfjeaR0jzZF+LGGZo9DThtrVfbP+wwC2DseCH4wpe9YHnsnF6NylzL70PZrYRUW8AFZzK A722jx/W1TOKa/NKXxIZzYEYynAEBLfGzD0LXMU1wzj1q5sxlnp73kd4OWbt2Dzsu5Crs72 VfLpusf/JRxyQvzL0UJ+Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mMnJ440Euog=:Umk7W1FHfoxeAufp3323Wl tM790w6per8ERezmuD64FxAjMhWDBbChoHPnJ7mjMIgtq8zkG/aGUlZSZVsChSaP2l39zU3ea NGbsR9QtowuaFUEz+fzPsj0m+kr7qC9shzOkBYgbPcohhjAf3hjzSW5DzOZkHIZCW1dqP5uZb ysrgh1Aw2NpHebz1v0z/LdFvLr2OD6Al9s7WOj8PaBZWKN9eUU1roucyvisOXBM0BveMnbRiz X2cHVe5G6hKwezrLIapU9oYXS7gcS8QPg8KgwWzD93VS8nRv45wgWV6o1Hy06sbWJ89ebDfDh xyjCMEe4OuWw2ZNtgcA/kW/v4HEzXRVcKVqYuku+xoia8JtHxt73twtoCj+0LHhl4i0LoXFm9 ddn+CAJDKx4XsHt9mV0ckybRcyfr0L7bq9n+wcS1tYMFf1oPnyj7Q5kFl6HoLkM5gYok2CXvE FIijIohvP4aBJvH0z0vdWiKn/FB116N4udWgCo+rhYLooYp8sA7uvoV6LRTiZBIZ7xvpr3DC8 aBwIhnm6T8KfD3O+Vg4fIjon2rtsP7LQAa3c0eFsy7yiGD04zMJgaf+I6Oq85yWlyxxO2n6aP lduHFHfgrcGs9iT4PdLRSqHuETjGe4L+2MLdC3iPXBVI3P367aRL4sVOX+GgKGToAC9bUsRSs jgBonl9b7SMdlJATLiu2ljz/3IiPGpcqyfR/x/Uc/E8Sx3V4Vein+UwwXEa+ifA1fOHLBjPLa SSPaPmcoIqJ0VUXE/hPnz2nHOKvjcMlVQRAVJ6XJFXitY1zI0TrHmtTtK6yzdTxN5lteEIZU Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=rudalics@gmx.at; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261855 Archived-At: > I'd like the old behavior for y-or-n-p, where any character not on > the list of special ones will err out of it. With that behavior, > the question about nesting yes-or-no-p inside won't matter. The most simple approach to get the old behavior back is to restore the old code for 'y-or-n-p', rename it to something like 'y-or-n-p-old' and call it when an option like `y-or-n-p-use-old' is non-nil. martin