From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-parameter a child-frame's 'parent-frame error on macOS ? Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:31 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <3341a4c3.36ca.160e851bdbd.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A5876A3.10402@gmx.at> <87fu7b6zsj.fsf@163.com> <5A5902D9.9070801@gmx.at> <16191b19.1392.160ed773bef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <5A59C872.1010900@gmx.at> <87tvvqxcxr.fsf@163.com> <5A59F476.1060806@gmx.at> <87mv1hcnw8.fsf@163.com> <5A5B1D46.6000608@gmx.at> <731a3868-e589-978b-ee34-ab72cf5c5aff@yandex.ru> <4d250ebc-7979-3229-b9ea-6e57089d02df@yandex.ru> <5A5C76AC.60308@gmx.at> <53c55d98-dbf6-7e6d-eaa5-66e565f93581@yandex.ru> <87d12agitl.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1wakv1d.fsf@gmail.com> <83efmhrigt.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp09j2jp.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7x5rhq0.fsf@gnu.org> <87shaxj1xc.fsf@gmail.com> <834lnd26tm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516640038 441 195.159.176.226 (22 Jan 2018 16:53:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 22 17:53:54 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edfLv-0007r0-BG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:53:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edfNv-0005Qk-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edfNl-0005PX-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:55:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edfNk-0001ZW-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:36456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edfNh-0001X8-Hi; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:55:37 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66748160E97; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id MJmCsyPCjjyE; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34A8161248; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id czK-qXyXIpnT; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84F69160F9F; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <834lnd26tm.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222147 Archived-At: On 01/22/2018 08:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> These two patches are not utterly trivial, but they're hardly complex >> either (and they fix real bugs). >> >>> We must draw the line somewhere, but where is that? >> In my opinion, the other side of these two fixes. Opinions will vary. >> [1] > What do others think? > I'd include both patches, as they seem safe and fix real and annoying bugs on scaled GTK displays.