From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:52:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86eeifawx8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87czxygdl9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86tur88izp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <831rec5apu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1magg4x.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86sg6o6c43.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8hb21wk.fsf@gnu.org> <83czxr1zl3.fsf@gnu.org> <835z3j1x0h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4477"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 15:54:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mDE-000125-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:54:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mDD-0001nj-4U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mBn-0000vL-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::634]:34732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4mBl-0003OY-V0; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id hs11so3073563ejc.1; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:52:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qd3eGj2dRwn51v6gOIxT/N3HUyy9Dkjr4ksE2NBZgII=; b=CeNOlRCD697ou0WKVJxda7Qiih9awm/qwBHYMe0tRmEn67jgEaBvc9gJ7f2cADxPP3 1PiLmFkM3IiQqQEMGSjViKDM2q9ITIItcQN9ILMDPkFmHb6wIa/SbDhJ1HjLA6X8sohE K+5Na+bixnJLlFUJI+hyKyvGzoQ99frCC1gyYM/2aNuKBJCP8bv51YFBO9fFNzUJwJuo NqXcL/8d7aGga4Gi99ybgV7dho+MAls14ySLwInHGTw7Ns3qVnLf9X0t7pIoZ0ibFCbH vtMLBogvbhvmqeOdp0uRYvQd6y3ZrdWgnIGF76Wb7cz//IbXhcRiyrnQ4CNhwG0vOiwm swIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qd3eGj2dRwn51v6gOIxT/N3HUyy9Dkjr4ksE2NBZgII=; b=V09w5eAQMq3Ea4uqWURySYklrB6zUli/bwep/r3oIpnSuJbKK4r7bwLzRoGksX18b6 BXkmHwznTCX/fzBp/KW9qjTsO444ZFDtCXgSqzgxt4BUgUW/TLHaZdSyMVBXNaDw/S9D iB/eJOq3245S9BBkjutAfyZLFvjgbz1R5GEzo6z9vt7lS7eJzQV2Dl+QT9npQ8WwJva8 nByVrMEdIqlOY8To3R3RAVrWtsUr9pQzC5Y1mfzOBcy14W0uXKXo8aXbTjiegcdV/nb3 RI3n3au8yTQpDfnffmrDgXqU0E4yYbXHeudUESG5NtRvaVPhrZ6oufoGtrTyUUY0imwj rzWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dBd2Q/gZZ13aWov0DO5cfZswsCsUzNr4FRtYAQA+1GczWn4jz Abnjmv5x4uhvjMLlXLV8YoISqqYc5dU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEMKiN2V53FC9DJySmDV++wM45rYSSjPQ0Jh9J8fJCZ1Q5ZTlCzKsCqBJWLSChiSvy5EypTw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2743:: with SMTP id a3mr7301284ejd.378.1611759176093; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:52:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lz27sm924291ejb.50.2021.01.27.06.52.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:52:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::634; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x634.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263506 Archived-At: On 26.01.2021 19:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If elpa.git is not in the frame, then how did elpa/ada-mode wind up in >> emacs.git? > Someone put it there manually. One (moderate) downside of this is those of us who are already subscribed to elpa-diffs will receive the notification emails for the same commits again from emacs-diffs.